MLBP v. Garvey. Do you agree or disagree with Justice Stevens that courts should have some limited power to overturn arbitration decisions when it is obvious that the abitrator erred?

Former Major League Baseball player Steve Garvey filed a claim for $3 million compensation from a $280 million dollar fund established by team owners to compensate players for income lost due to collusion among team owners in the late-1980s. Since the fund was under the collective bargaining agreement between the players and the owners, and the allocation of the money was subject to labor arbitration, the proceedings were subject to the Labor Management Relations Act. The arbitrator rejected the evidence presented by Garvey and awarded him nothing. Garvey appealed to the courts. The court of appeals reversed the decision of the arbitrator and ordered Garvey be awarded $3 million. The players association appealed to the Supreme Court.