mpml v mike pero case Cases on prejudices. Some quite close down. Mike pero is a successful business person. Stage agent mortgage broker, even did a donald trump apprentice show. It is all about jim. He built his business on mike pero , his signature his face. All about his constant marketing. He went into business with a person called sheriman ma who is a us educator. Much alot of investment in ausie and also well known for suing people. Very aggressive investor and not scared to go to court. Not 100% sure why they would be moving together? Ma is worth $ half a billion dollar and pero might be well known in nz but not a big business highly in use. In term of the structure, it was mike pero in the face of the company. Everything was about marketing real estate. You dont see anything without his face on it . Key indicator that ma didnt take this investment seriously bec he is a professional director. He didn't appoint a director, he had the right to but didnt appoint a director. So pero is sole director of the company and ma was a passive shareholder. So clearly the situation pero is doing all the work, his face, his marketing, no one know who shareholder ma is unless sued by the australian. So he decided to give himself a pay increase. And he decided to pay himself fees, quarter of million fees for marketing fees. Ma woke up to this and claim prejudice