Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Mr. Firdaus, who is the owner of FeerDaus Sdn. Bhd. (FSB), instructed his employee named Tam to order several office supplies from Sinar Sdn. Bhd.

Mr. Firdaus, who is the owner of FeerDaus Sdn. Bhd. (FSB), instructed his employee named

Tam to order several office supplies from Sinar Sdn. Bhd. (Sinar). On May 6, Tam made the

order under FSBs name but the order was made from Suria Sdn. Bhd. (Suria). When the

delivery invoice was given to Mr. Firdaus on May 10, he signed the invoice although Surias

name and logo were clearly seen on the invoice. However, when FSBs finance clerk wanted

to make payment to Suria on May 12, Mr. Firdaus prevented the payment. Mr. Firdaus gave

the excuse that he instructed Tam to make the order from Sinar and not from Suria. Therefore,

FSB refused to be liable for the payment to Suria. Based on three (3) statutory provisions and

one (1) case authority relating to the law of agency, determine whether Mr. Firdaus may do so

or otherwise.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Challenge Of Management Accounting Change

Authors: John Burns, Mahmoud Ezzamel, Robert Scapens

1st Edition

075066004X, 978-0750660044

More Books

Students also viewed these Accounting questions

Question

Networking is a two-way street. Discuss this statement.

Answered: 1 week ago