Ms. Frizzle is currently on a field trip in Asia with her class where they are studying the Siamese Fighting Fish in their natural habitat (also known as Betta fish). Before embarking on their trip, she predicted that the pond would be full of 64% veiltails, 24% crowntails, and then 12% halfmoon tails. Ms. Frizzle documented the different observed betta tails in the chart below. Using a 0.05 significance level, test the claim that the actual frequencies correspond to what Ms. Frizzle predicted.

What conclusion should you make based 0n the given data? a. Fail to reject Ho due to insuicient evidence and conclude that the observed Beta tail types correspond with Ms. Frizzle's predicted distribution. b. Fail to reject H4] due to sufcient evidence and conclude that the observed Beta tail types correspond with Ms. Frizzle's predicted distribution. c. Accept H due to sufficient evidence and conclude that Ms. Frizzle's actual 'equencies correspond to her predicted distribution. d. Reject Ha due to insufficient evidence and conclude that at least one of the observed Beta tail types does not correspond with Ms. Frizzle's predicted distribution. e. Reject Hg due to sufcient evidence and conclude that at least one of the observed Beta tail types does not correspond with Ms. Frizzte's predicted distribution