Mullens v. Hansel-Henderson, 65 P.3D 992 (2002) 1. Why do you think contingency fee cases require written agreements? 2. What logical reason could Mullens have had for not getting his client to sign a new fee agreement? 3. Once of the advantages of representing clients on a contingency fee basis is not having to keep time sheets. But if you don't keep accurate daily time records, how could you prove your quantum meruit case? 4. what policies would you adopt for your law firm?