Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Murtaza drew a cheque for Rs. 50,000 in favour of his landlord Abdullah. The cheque was not presented for payment by Abdullah within a reasonable

  1. Murtaza drew a cheque for Rs. 50,000 in favour of his landlord Abdullah. The cheque was not presented for payment by Abdullah within a reasonable time of its issue. Murtaza suffered damage of Rs. 30,000 through the delay because the bank failed.

Describe whether Abdullah can recover the money in the above circumstances as per the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

  1. A cheque is drawn payable to 'B or order'. It is stolen and B's endorsement is forged. The banker pays the cheque in due course. Is the banker discharged from liability? Would it make any difference if the drawer's signature were forged?

  1. Any material alteration to a negotiable instrument renders the instrument void. What are the exceptions to this rule?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Constitutional Law Cases Materials And Problems

Authors: Russell L. Weaver, Steven I. Friedland, Richard D. Rosen

5th Edition

1543830447, 978-1543830446

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions