Nadia is accused of kidnapping a child. The federal court handling the case refers to a previous similar case and decides to sentence Nadia to 15 years in prison. Her lawyer, however, appeals to the Supreme Court, which then finds that the facts of the previous case are different from Nadia's case. The Supreme Court has __________. A. misinterpreted the facts of the previous case that is similar to Nadia's case B. distinguished the facts of Nadia's case from the facts of the previous case C. breached the doctrine of stare decisis D. usurped the constitutional right of the federal court to decide the case