Question
National Audubon v. Hoffman 1. Who were the parties involved in the case? (plaintiff/defendant/respondent/petitioner) Fill in the blank 2. What were the facts in the
National Audubon v. Hoffman
1. Who were the parties involved in the case? (plaintiff/defendant/respondent/petitioner)
Fill in the blank
2. What were the facts in the case?
The Forest Service planned extensive timber cutting in a part of the Green Mountain National Forest but did not prepare an environmental impact statement. A coalition of conservation organizations and environmentalists, believing that the action would have potential negative impact on black bears, whose habitat would be disturbed, and endanger the neotropical bird population, filed a lawsuit to compel the Forest Service to prepare the EIS. The district court found that the Forest Service had failed to consider all relevant factors when determining the environmental significance of its proposed action and was directed to prepare a site-specific EIS and enjoined from further timber harvesting and road building until completion of the EIS.
3. What was the Rule of Law in the case? (Rule of law the court applies to determine the rights of the parties)
Fill in the blank
4.Who won the case? Why?
Fill in the blank
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started