Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

need help to solve this question It is often argued that investing in mass transport system is beneficial to citizens because reducing commuting time to

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

image text in transcribed

need help to solve this question

image text in transcribed

It is often argued that investing in mass transport system is beneficial to citizens because reducing commuting time to workplace allows workers to spend more time on leisure. To study this, you collected data of Sydney residents on commuting time to workplace and expenditure on entertainment. Load the dataset using the following command: Each observation in the dataset represents a worker. Variables in the dataset are: expenditure: monthly expenditure on entertainment, in Australian dollars time: commuting time to workplace, in hours pass: explained later (a) (3 points) Consider the regression: expenditure = a + 3x time + . 1 Suggest a confounding factor that makes not a causal effect of commuting time on expenditure on entertainment. (b) (3 points) Suppose that City of Sydney gave a "Sydney motorway pass" to randomly chosen workers in Sydney, allowing pass holders to use motorways free of charge. Explain why it is a valid instrument for commuting time in the regression in (a). (c) (3 points) In the dataset, the variable pass is equal to 1 if the individual received Sydney motorway pass and equal to 0 if not. Estimate the causal effect of commuting time on expenditure on entertainment using 2SLS. (d) (2 points) According to the estimate in (c), what would be the expected change in expenditure on entertainment if the commuting time is reduced by 15 minutes (0.25 hour)? (e) (2 points) Is the causal effect in (c) statistically significant at the 5% significance level? (f) (2 points) Check if pass is a weak instrument. (g) (2 points) Based on (c) and (e), conclude whether reduction in commuting time causes increase in expenditure on entertainment. (h) (3 points) Suppose instead that City of Sydney gave a "Sydney experience pass" to randomly chosen workers in Sydney, which offers discounts to movie tickets in addition to what Sydney motorway pass offers. Explain why this is not a valid instrument for commuting time in the regression in (a). > 1m. a = 1m 1m (expenditure (expenditure ~ time, data=dat) > vc.a = vcovHC (1m.a, tyoe = "HC1") > coeftest (1m.a, vcov. = vc.a) t test of coefficients: Pr (>|t|) Estimate Std. Error t value 324.57360 (Intercept) 0.96804 335.29 1m. a = 1m 1m (expenditure (expenditure ~ time, data=dat) > vc.a = vcovHC (1m.a, tyoe = "HC1") > coeftest (1m.a, vcov. = vc.a) t test of coefficients: Pr (>|t|) Estimate Std. Error t value 324.57360 (Intercept) 0.96804 335.29

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Quantitative Analysis For Management

Authors: Barry Render, Ralph M. Stair, Michael E. Hanna, Trevor S. Hale

14th Edition

0137943601, 9780137943609

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions

Question

Discuss the general cost recovery method for farming assets?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

a neglect of quality in relationship to international competitors;

Answered: 1 week ago