need help with these questions thanks!

1. Omar Little has been arrested on suspicion of child pornography possession. Detective Jimmy McNulty is convinced that Omars smartphone has evidence linking him to possession and filming of child pornography from a local studio Omar owns and manages. According to McNultys informant, Bunk, the children are set to be trafficked to Mexico later that night. Does McNulty need to acquire a warrant based on probable cause in order to search the phone? A. Yes because a warrant is always required before law enforcement may conduct a search of an individuals smartphone. B. Yes because smartphone privacy receives the most deference from the courts. C. No because search of the smartphone would be a search incident to an arrest. D. No because McNulty has sufficient reason to believe a child may be in danger.

2. Which of the following is not a primary impact of the USA PATRIOT Act? A. Enhancing the federal governments capacity to share intelligence. B. Preventing foreign nationals from traveling to the United States. C. Removing obstacles to investigating terrorism. D. Strengthening the criminal laws against terrorism.

3. Federal wiretap laws primarily protect what type of information? A. The identity of the sender and receiver of communications. B. The content of communications. C. The date, duration, and time of communications. D. The location of the sender and receiver of communications.

4. If law enforcement wishes to access an individuals historical cell phone location records from a telecommunications provider without a warrant, then which of the following best describes the state of the law with respect to law enforcements options? A. A warrant is never required to access an individuals historical cell phone location records from a telecommunications provider. B. A warrant is always required to access an individuals historical cell phone location records from a telecommunications provider. C. Law enforcement must look to the jurisdiction it is in to find guidance on this issue until the Supreme Court renders a ruling on the matter D. Law enforcement can do absolutely nothing in pursuit of historical cell phone location records until the Supreme Court renders a ruling on the matter.

Questions 5 through 7 involve the following story: Eleanor, Chidi, Tahani, and Jianyu live together in the same house that sits on a large plot of land a good place, if you will. A glass shed, completely transparent, sits 50 yards away from the house, and both the house and shed are enclosed by the same fencing. The gang is growing marijuana in both the house and the shed, and law enforcement is trying to gather evidence before it is too late. 5. The police have a thermal imaging device available on their standard issued smart phones. Can the police use this device from a public street to determine relative heat patterns within the house and use that information to support probable cause for a warrant? A. Yes because the device is standard issue on their phones. B. Yes because there is no reasonable expectation as to heat patterns emanating from the house. C. No because use of such a device constitutes a search under the Kyllo case, which has yet to be reconsidered by the Supreme Court. D. No because use of such a tool will always be considered unconstitutional. 6. If the police search the glass shed without a warrant, what is the gangs best argument to say that the shed should be considered curtilage? A. The shed is 50 yards away from the home. B. The shed is glass and transparent. C. The shed and house are enclosed by the same fence. D. So many people live in a single home that it is reasonable to assume the shed is used for home activities as well. 7. Police also suspect that the gang is selling marijuana to users on the other side of town. To gather evidence, police have installed a GPS on the under carriage of their jeep and plan to monitor its location over the course of thirty-two days. Based on established precedent, and without speculating as to what a new Supreme Court would hold, do the police need a warrant? A. Yes, because of a GPS device constitutes a physical trespass. B. Yes, because you always need a warrant to track a persons movements. C. No, because the police are only monitoring the location for thirty-two days. D. No, because you never need a warrant to track a persons public movements. 8. Which of the following is not a category of concerns created by the lack of clear guidance in Titles 10 and 50 of the United States Code? A. Rice bowls B. Oversight C. Efficiency D. Authority