New York Flowers is required, as a condition of their contract, to supply the Super Tasty, a trendy restaurant, with 50 flower arrangements for tables and three (3) large displays, twice a week. The cost is $3,000 a week. New York Flowers and Super Tasty have a valid contract. This week, it was one table arrangements short one day and two (2) short on the other.

The owner of Super Tasty was furious. Can Super Tasty argue that New York Flowers failure to perform the contract means Super Tasty does not have to pay at all? Why or why not?