nited States v $.$ ?Moore: Moore was convicted of bank robbery. At the time of his arrest, the police found his fingerprints on an air pistol packaging. There was no evidence indicating that the pistol in the packaging was the one used in the robbery. Moore argued that the fingerprints were irrelevant to the case and should not have admitted into evidence. The appellate court held that the fingerprints were $\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_.$