Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

nnauct Law- Weddi Tlade Show Case- Stu Unit 5 In November 2021, the plaintiffs Philip Cameo and Alicia James went to a wedding show (Trade

image text in transcribed
nnauct Law- Weddi Tlade Show Case- Stu Unit 5 In November 2021, the plaintiffs Philip Cameo and Alicia James went to a wedding show (Trade show, Wedding expo}. They saw a booth where couples could enter a draw for a prize worth $20.00!] towards their wedding reception. The prize was a $201300 voucher to be used at the Swanson Banquet Hall. Swanson was one of the sponsors of the wedding expo. But, Swanson Banquet Hall was still under oonstmction. They were promoting their new facility in advance of its opening. Swanson Banquet Hall was expected to be a gorgeous. shiny, brand-new banquet facility. Philip and Alicia lled out a ballot for the draw and they won. They planned to get marn' ed and have a reception on September 14, 2022. Over the next while the couple went ahead making wedding plans. Meanwhile, Swanson Banquet Hall was still under construction. In May 2222, Philip and Alicia sent wedding invitations to 3110 guests. The reception was planned to be held at Swanson Banquet Hall. But then everything went wrong. In July they found out that Swanson Banquet Hall would not be open and ready to hold their wedding dinner on September 14, 2622. Philip and Alicia did nd another ptaoe to have the wedding reception. And they decided to sue Swanson Banquet Hall. More details: The Plaintiffs {Philip and Alicia}, total cost at the substituted facility came to around 833.2130, including the banquet hall expenses {$29293}; new invitations {MUD} and table centrepieces {$3.5m}. The Plaintiffs seek damages in the amount of $2.D based upon breach of contract. In essence, the wedding now costs the couple much more than they had anticipated. The money they were suing for was the $2D.DUD prize voucher they won in the draw at the wedding expo. Note: The ballot they lled out for the draw had the following written on it. Provisions of all prizes are the responsibility of the oontest sponsors. Prizes must be accepted as awarded and cannot be redeemed for cash or exchanged except at the sole discretion of the contest sponsors. Contest sponsors reserve the light to substitute a prize of equal or greater value if the described prize cannot be awarded for any reason

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Ethical Problems In The Practice Of Law Concise Version

Authors: Lisa G. Lerman, Philip G. Schrag

4th Edition

1454891289, 978-1454891284

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions

Question

What is the spectator role?

Answered: 1 week ago

Question

Personal role: This consists of service to family and friends.

Answered: 1 week ago