Nominal Versus effective cost of debt: Black & Deckera U.S. multinational manufacturer of small power toolsis considering financing a plant expansion in France with euro() Eurobonds. The issue would be a five-year maturity instrument with a coupon rate of 7 percent to be paid semiannually, whereas the principal repayment occurs at maturity. A comparable financing in U.S.($) would cost the borrower a coupon rate of 10 percent.

a. Assuming the U.S. dollars depreciates at a rate of 1 percent(0.5 percent semiannually), the effective tax rate of Black & Decker U.S. is 35 percent, and the exchange losses on principal repayments are tax-deductible, which long-term financing option should be selected? On the date of the issue, 1 = $1.34.

b. Would your answer change if exchange losses on principal repayment were not tax-deductibles?

c. A similar financing arrangement with bonds denominated in pound sterling at a coupon rate of 8.5 percent annually is possible. Should Black & Decker U.S. consider such a financing?