non-compete agreements prohibit an employee from engaging in a business that competes with his/her current employer's business, often even after the employee leaves his current job. These contracts are often upheld as long as they are reasonable in scope and geographic location. Recently, however, more and more courts and legislative bodies have been striking down these contracts down as illegal. Read this articlehttps://www.reuters.com/article/us-jimmyjohns-settlement/jimmy-johns-settles-illinois-lawsuit-over-non-compete-agreements-idUSKBN13W2JA about a lawsuit against Jimmy John's (a franchised sandwich fast food restaurant chain with about 2700 locations) relating to the non-compete agreements signed by its workers. Then, answer the following questions: 1)What did the non-compete agreement say and why was it such a big deal that the attorney general of Illinois got involved and sued Jimmy John's? 2) Would the outcome of the case have been any different if the non-compete was signed only by the CEO of Jimmy John's instead of the workers? What might be different about the CEO's position than the workers?