NOTES: YOUR RESEARCH PAPER WILL BE ASSESSED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1. AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE TAXATION ISSUES 2. WHAT IS THE CURRENT LAW? 3. WHAT ARE THE PERCEIVED WEAKNESSES OF THE CURRENT LAW? 4. HOW THE GOVERNMENT PROPOSES TO ADDRESS THEM 5. YOUR VIEWS/RECOMMENDATIONS ON ADDRESSING THE ISSUE 6. YOU WILL BE MARKED DOWN IF YOUR PAPER IS MERELY A REGURGITATION OF THE FACTS. A RESEARCH PAPER REQUIRES YOU TO IDENTIFY THE ISSUES, UNDERSTAND THE REASONS FOR THE LAW, A REVIEW OF THE CASE LAW /LEGISLATION AND THEN YOUR VIEWS/RECOMMENDATIONS ON CORRECTING THE ISSUE. ASSIGNMENT QUESTION: THERE ARE TWO QUESTIONS, PART A and PART B. YOU MUST COMPLETE BOTH QUESTIONS. THE MAXIMUM WORD LIMIT IN TOTAL IS 2,500 PLUS OR MINUS 10% Part A: Download the case of Harding v FCT 2019 (FCAFC) 29 (see attached link for the case) https:// www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/ fca/full/2019/2019fcafc0029 In your paper you need to: 1. Analyse the case ie what was the legal principle that arose from the case 2. What was the existing law the judges referred to? 3. How did they interpret the phrase \"permanent place of abode\"? 4. Why did they disagree with the judge in the first court? 5. Do you think the current definition of residence needs to be amended? (suggested word limit 1,500 -1800) NOTES: YOUR RESEARCH PAPER WILL BE ASSESSED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1. AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE TAXATION ISSUES 2. WHAT IS THE CURRENT LAW? 3. WHAT ARE THE PERCEIVED WEAKNESSES OF THE CURRENT LAW? 4. HOW THE GOVERNMENT PROPOSES TO ADDRESS THEM 5. YOUR VIEWS/RECOMMENDATIONS ON ADDRESSING THE ISSUE 6. YOU WILL BE MARKED DOWN IF YOUR PAPER IS MERELY A REGURGITATION OF THE FACTS. A RESEARCH PAPER REQUIRES YOU TO IDENTIFY THE ISSUES, UNDERSTAND THE REASONS FOR THE LAW, A REVIEW OF THE CASE LAW /LEGISLATION AND THEN YOUR VIEWS/RECOMMENDATIONS ON CORRECTING THE ISSUE