NPV unequal lives. Grady Enterprises is looking at two project opportunities for a parcel of land the company currently owns. The first project is a restaurant, and the second project is a sports facility. The projected cash flow of the restaurant is an initial cost of $$1,600,000$ with cash flows over the next six years of $$150,000($year one$),$ $$240,000($year two$),$ $$330,000($years three through five$),$ and $$1,770,000($year six$),$ at which point Grady plans to sell the restaurant. The sports facility has the following cash flows: an initial cost of $$2,480,000$ with cash flows over the next four years of $$450,000($years one through three$)$ and $$2,970,000($year four$),$ at which point Grady plans to sell the facility. If the appropriate discount rate for the restaurant is $11\mathrm{.}0\%$ and the appropriate discount rate for the sports facility is $12\mathrm{.}0\%,$ use the NPV to determine which project Grady should choose for the parcel of land. Adjust the NPV for unequal lives with the equivalent annual annuity. Does the decision change?

If the appropriate discount rate for the restaurant is $11\mathrm{.}0\%,$ what is the NPV of the restaurant project?

$($Round to the nearest cent.$)$

If the appropriate discount rate for the sports facility is $12\mathrm{.}0\%,$ what is the NPV of the sports facility?

$

$($Round to the nearest cent.$)$

Based on the NPV$,$ Grady should pick the $(1)$ project. $($Select from the drop$-$down menu.$)$

What is the adjusted NPV equivalent annual annuity of the restaurant project?

$

$($Round to the nearest cent.$)$

What is the adjusted NPV equivalent annual annuity of the sports facility?

$($Round to the nearest cent.$)$

Based on the adjusted NPV$,$ Grady should pick the $(2)$ project. $($Select from the drop$-$down menu.$)$

Does the decision change? $(3)$

$($Select from the drop$-$down menu.$)$

$(1)$ sports facility

$(2)$ sports facility

$(3)$ Yes restaurant restaurant No