Of 560 samples of seafood purchased from various kinds of food stores in different regions of a country and genetically compared to standard gene fragments that can identify the species, 53% were mislabeled. a) Construct a 90% condence interval for the proportion of all seafood sold in the country that is mislabeled or misidentied. b) Explain what your condence interval says about seafood sold in the country. c) A government spokesperson claimed that the sample size was too small, relative to the billions of pieces of seafood sold each year, to generalize. Is this criticism valid? a) What is the 90% condence interval? The 90% condence interval is from |:|% to D%. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) b) What does the condence interval say about seafood sold in the country? 0 A. There is a 90% chance that the true proportion of mislabeled seafood is in the interval. 0 B. In 90% of samples of seafood sold in the country, the proportion that is mislabeled will be in the interval. 0 C. We are 90% condent that the interval captures the true proportion of all seafood sold in the country that is mislabeled. C) Is the government spokesperson's criticism valid? 0 A. Yes, the sample size must be at least 10% of the population, or the results cannot be generalized. O B. No, until another study produces a different interval, the results should be generalized. O C. No, as long as the necessary assumptions and conditions were met, the results can be generalized