Of course anarchy has been and is likely to remain the primary ordering principle of international relations. Nevertheless, when we survey relations among actors on the international stage we find a high degree of order, security, and cooperationphenomena which are seemingly ill-suited to the condition of anarchy. Explain how a realist/neo-realist, liberal/neo-liberal, and a Marxist would explain this outcome. Which explanation do think is most convincing and why?

AROUND 500 words