• of the following which properly defines "reasonable doubt" ( my answer D)

A. fair an honest doubt

b. actual and substantial doubt

c. mere possible doubt

d. a and b only

e. all of the above

• the recognized reasons for the rules which evidence include. ( my answer B)

A. protect the accused

B. to protect certain relationships as privileged

C. to promote orderly efficient trails

D. A and B

E. all the above

• how much evidence must a defendant produce to assert insanity as an affirmative defense in an Oklahoma state court prosecution (my answer B)

A. clear and convincing evidence of insanity

B. evidence of insanity beyond a reasonable doubt

C. a preponderance of evidence of insanity

D. sufficient evidence to raise a reasonable doubt as to sanity

• which burden of proof standard applies to a defendant asserting insanity as an affirmative defense in a federal court prosecution. ( my answer B)

A. clear and convincing evidence

B. beyond a reasonable doubt

C. preponderance of the evidence

D. none of the above

• Which burden of proof standard applies to a defendant asserting insanity as an affirmative defense in an Oklahoma state court prosecution. (my answer B)

A. clear and convincing evidence

B. evidence of insanity beyond a reasonable doubt

C. preponderance of the evidence

D. none of the above

• with respect to an affirmative defense in a criminal case, who has the burden of going forward. (my answer B)

A. the prosecutor because the burden of proof never shifts in a criminal case

B. the defendant because he has the burden to produce evidence to support a theory he relies upon

C. the trial judge, because he must rule on the availability of the defense asserted

D. none of the above.

i want to make sure that i answered these questions right if not please help!!!!