Officer Ingram arrested Harry Pearson for disorderly conduct, and during the arrest, Ingram broke Pearson's arm. The criminal charge against Pearson was dropped the next day, and the police department opened an investigation into Officer Ingram's conduct. Detective Graham of the internal affairs division ran the investigation. At the end of the investigation, Detective Graham filed a report concluding that Ingram failed to use proper police procedure and that he intentionally broke Pearson's arm because Pearson insulted him during the arrest. Pearson sued Officer Ingram for excessive use of force. As part of his case-in-chief, Pearson seeks to admit the results of the police investigation in order to prove that Ingram failed to use proper police procedure and that he intentionally broke Pearson's arm. Are the results of the investigation admissible? Group of answer choices The results of the investigation are admissible, but only if Detective Graham testifies. The results of the investigation are admissible, but only if Detective Graham is unavailable. The results of the investigation are admissible. The results of the investigation are inadmissible