Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Omer has sued Sharmeen for the tort of negligence. Sharmeen argues that she did not owe a duty of care to Omer and, therefore, has
Omer has sued Sharmeen for the tort of negligence. Sharmeen argues that she did not owe a duty of care to Omer and, therefore, has no liability. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
Sharmeen may owe duty of care to Omer, even if there is no close and direct connection between them.
The court may refuse to recognize a duty of care even if it was reasonably foreseeable that Omer might be injured by Sharmeen's carelessness, on grounds that public policy does not permit the extension of the duty of care to this kind of relationship.
The court will not recognize the existence of a duty of care if Omer was injured as a result of Sharmeen's omission, rather than by her action:
The court may recognize the existence of a duty of care even if it was not reasonably foreseeable that Omer might be injured by Sharmeen's carelessness.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started