On 01 March 2014, Apolinario bought a land from Antonio paying the latter in cash. Since they were close friends, they did not execute any document of sale. On 17 March 2020, Apolinario died. On 07 March 2021, the heirs of Apolinario asked Antonio to execute a deed of absolute sale to formalize the sale between him and their father. However, Antonio refused. The heirs of Apolinario filed an action for specific performance against Antonio. Will their action prosper? * No, the action to enforce the agreement between Apolinario and Antonio had already elapsed. No, since the sale cannot be enforced under the Statute of Frauds. Yes, since Apolinario bought the land from Antonio and in fact, paid it. Yes, after full payment, the action became imprescriptible.Robie and Sara discussed the possibility of entering to a contract of lease over a condominium unit in BGC. Robie expressed her acceptance and willingness to lease Sara's property. Can Sara still withdraw the offer? * () Yes, as owner of the property, Sara has the option to withdraw anytime Yes, because the reservation is not supported by a consideration. No, the contract of lease has been perfected. O) No, Robie's acceptance already binds Sara's offer.Angel was found guilty by the court of the crime of theft of a television set belonging to Bernardo. The court sentenced Angel to suffer the penalty of prision mayor as period of imprisonment and ordered her to return the television set. What best describes the civil liability imposed? *0 O Restitution O Rescission O Indemnification O ReparationKaren, a rising star in the showbiz industry, entered into a contract with ABS-CBN Entertainment. Harry, a close friend of Karen, induces her to violate one of the terms set by ABS-CBN Entertainment in the contract. Can ABS-CBN file an action for damages against Harry? * O) Yes, even if Harry has no knowledge of the contract between Karen and ABS-CBN Entertainment. No, because Harry is not a contracting party. ( Yes, inducing a contracting party to violate a contract will give rise to liability for pay damages. No, under the principle of relativity of contracts.Jose is under obligation to deliver to Pedro, at the option of Jose, a car, a pick-up truck, or a van, all of which are specific. 1st Answer: If the car and the pick-up truck were lost through Jose's fault, he has no choice but to deliver the van; If the van was lost through a fortuitous event before delivery, the obligation is extinguished and Jose is not liable. 2nd Answer: If the pick-up truck and the car were lost through a fortuitous event, Jose has no choice but to deliver the van; if before delivery, the van was lost because of Jose's fault, he is liable. * O Both answers are incorrect. Both answers are correct. O Only the first answer is correct. O c. Only the second answer is correct