On a recent Thursday evening, Micah was sitting peacefully at the bar inside a local restaurant sipping a beer and watching a game. Suddenly, a fight broke out between two other patrons and one of them threw a beer bottle. The bottle-thrower was drunk, had bad throwing mechanics and bad aim, and, consequently, the bottle missed its intended target. Instead, the bottle hit Micah, who was not involved in the fight, across the back of his head. The bottle shattered; the shards of class cut Micah's ear, cheek, and scalp. Which of the following describe obvious and straightforward legal cases that could result from this incident? (select all that correctly respond to the question) Group of answer choices This is an example of a crime against a person. The state can prosecute the bottle-throwing patron for the act of forcibly making an offensive contact with another person that caused an injury. In fact, the extent of the injuries Micah suffered and the possibility that the bottle could be considered a weapon are potentially the type of "aggravating" factors that would lead to a more serious charge. Based on the precedent set in MacPherson v. Buick, Micah can sue both Joe Simmons, the bar owner, and the Duff Beer Brewery, the manufacturer of the beer bottle under the rule of respondeat superior. This is an example of an intentional tort against Micah's person, most likely a battery, committed by the bottle thrower. Micah can sue the bottle-throwing patron for the injuries he s