Question
On January 2, 2016, George Wood, the executive vice president and CFO of Hughes Energy and Transportation Company, was preparing for the January meeting of
On January 2, 2016, George Wood, the executive vice president and CFO of Hughes Energy and Transportation Company, was preparing for the January meeting of the Capital Budget Committee (CBC) with Hughes brothers. The CBC is considering 10 projects representing $45 in capital expenditures. Unfortunately, the Hughes brothers have imposed a spending limit on the total investment and have mandated to not exceed the firms internal funds. With the new fiscal year, there was a need to determine which projects best fits the Companys future growth value enhancement. Thus, the challenge for the Committee was to allocate the funds among competing projects efficiently to increase the Companys value.
The Company
Hughes Energy and Transportation Company (Hughes) is managed by the three Hughes brothers, and Gorge Woods, son-in-law of the oldest Hughes brother. Hughes through its two divisions produces and markets coal and mineral primarily to utilities and industrial users and operates as a transportation company that provides truck and carrier services in the United States, Mexico, and Canada.
Its energy division which is mainly in coal and mining produces a range of steam coals with varying sulfur and heat contents. The company operates 10 underground mining complexes in Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, and West Virginia. As of December 31, 2015, it had approximately 1.1 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves. The company also leases land; and operates a coal loading terminal with a capacity of 8.0 million tons with ground storage of approximately 60,000 to 70,000 tons on the Ohio River at Mt. Vernon, Indiana. In addition, it buys and resells coal; and manufactures and sells rock dust. Further, the company offers various products and services, which comprise the design and installation of underground mine hoists for transporting employees and materials in and out of mines; design of systems for automating and controlling various aspects of industrial and mining environments; and design and sale of mine safety equipment, including its miner and equipment tracking and proximity detection systems.
Its transportation division provides services to automotive, steel, oil and gas, alternative energy, and manufacturing industries, as well as other transportation companies who aggregate loads from various shippers. As of December 31, 2015, its fleet consisted of 2,166 in-service tractors and 6,054 in-service trailers.
Capital Budget Committee and Project Selection
The Capital Budget Committee at Hughes is composed of Hughes brothers and Woods. Typically, Woods solicit investment proposal from managing directors and if the project cost exceeds $500,000, it required the approval of CBC. For this year, the directors have recommended 10 projects which exceeded the capital expenditure limits. Table 1 and 2 provide a brief description of the projects and initial cost and the estimated cash flow of each project (after tax profit plus depreciation) over its estimated life.
Financial Information
At the end of 2015, the Company had net income of $79,893 and total asset was $1,017,032; consisting of $711,922, from to energy segment and $305,110 from transportation services.
On the basis of its net income, Woods wants to know how much money is available for capital investments as shown in Table 2. Its established common stocks dividend payout ratio after the preferred stock dividends payment is 50 percent of the funds. Currently the preferred stock has a 8 percent dividend yield with a par value of $100. A 12 percent cost of capital for funds generated internally has been used in the past, and Woods sees no reason to depart from this figure. Any additional funds used for capital budgeting purposes will have to come from external financing. In discussions with the Hughes brothers, Woods informed them that any additional external funds will have a 14 percent rather than the 12 percent current cost of capital.
Questions:
How much of the internal fund is available for investments?
Which quantitative methods are useful to evaluate the projects?
Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the quantitative methods you used to select the projects.
Which quantitative ranking results in the highest value to the company?
Are there any conflicts among the rankings of the projects? How do you resolve the conflict in ranking?
What project(s) should the CBC should recommend for the coming year based on 12 and 14 percent cost of capital?
Are there any issues about the projects that CBC did not consider before the recommendation?
The CBC has decided to finance all of the profitable projects based on its market capital structure but was worried that some of the projects have different risk than the firms overall risk. CBC decided to gather public information about its two divisions as shown in tables 5 and 6. The Company has 20 million shares outstanding and its stock price closed at $31.45 per share on the first week of January, 2016.
Preferred stock is trading at a price of $80 per share with a dividend yield of 8 percent. The current debt was financed with 30-year long-term debt with a par value of $1,000 and was issued 10 years ago with a coupon rate of 8%. The current bond is trading at its par value. However the new debt financing will have a 20 year maturity with interest rate based on Treasury bond rate and risk spread of 4.4%.
1. Determine market value of the capital structures.
2. What is the equity cost of capital of each division?
3. What would be the Companys weighted average cost of capital before new financing?
4. What is the equity cost of capital after financing?
5. What is the Companys weighted average cost of capital after new financing?
6. Compare the expected rate of return of each project with each division equity cost of capital. Which projects should CBC recommend?
7. Is there any change in your recommendations if the comparison is made with the Companys weighted average cost of capital?
Table 1- CHARACTERISTICS OF INVESTMENT PROPOSALS
| |
A | Expand mining facilities at the Illinois |
B | Alternative plan for the Illinois is the expansion of terminal freight |
C | Expand mining facilities at Indiana |
D | Special handling equipment for a mining operation in Indiana, |
E | Special handling equipment for mining operation in West Virginia |
F | Alternative plan for the West Virginia is the purchase of ten new forklift |
G | Expand mining facilities at Kentucky |
H | Purchase of ten new tractor-trailer for Kentucky operation |
I | Purchase of ten new tractor-trailer rigs Maryland operation |
J | Expand mining facilities in Maryland |
Table 2 Projects | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J |
Year | Initial Investment | |||||||||
| ($4,000,000) | ($3,000,000) | ($3,000,000) | ($4,000,000) | ($7,000,000) | ($4,000,000) | ($5,000,000) | ($5,000,000) | ($5,000,000) | ($5,000,000) |
| Cash Flows | |||||||||
1 | 750,000 | 1,250,000 | 550,000 | 1,250,000 | 1,500,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,250,000 | 900,000 | 1,500,000 | 500,000 |
2 | 750,000 | 975,000 | 550,000 | 1,250,000 | 1,500,000 | 2,000,000 | 2,250,000 | 900,000 | 1,400,000 | 650,000 |
3 | 750,000 | 750,000 | 550,000 | 1,250,000 | 1,500,000 | 1,500,000 | 2,250,000 | 900,000 | 1,300,000 | 750,000 |
4 | 750,000 | 650,000 | 550,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,500,000 |
|
| 900,000 | 1,000,000 | 800,000 |
5 | 750,000 | 500,000 | 550,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,500,000 |
|
| 900,000 | 750,000 | 900,000 |
6 | 750,000 | 450,000 | 550,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,500,000 |
|
| 900,000 | 650,000 | 1,000,000 |
7 | 750,000 |
| 550,000 |
| 1,500,000 |
|
| 900,000 | 500,000 | 1,100,000 |
8 | 750,000 |
| 550,000 |
| 1,500,000 |
|
| 900,000 | 450,000 | 1,500,000 |
9 | 750,000 |
| 550,000 |
|
|
|
| 900,000 | 300,000 | 1,750,000 |
10 | 750,000 |
| 550,000 |
|
|
|
| 900,000 | 300,000 | 2,000,000 |
Table 3- Balance Sheet (in thousands) | 31-Dec-13 | 31-Dec-14 | 31-Dec-15 |
Assets | |||
Current Assets | |||
Cash And Cash Equivalents | $18,177 | $18,137 | $18,097 |
Net Receivables | $123,978 | $128,933 | $133,889 |
Inventory | $111,169 | $116,768 | $122,366 |
Other Current Assets | $34,427 | $31,569 | $28,710 |
Total Current Assets | $287,752 | $295,407 | $303,063 |
Long Term Investments | $67,302 | $72,332 | $77,362 |
Property Plant and Equipment | $619,721 | $642,100 | $664,479 |
Goodwill | $10,238 | $10,219 | $10,200 |
Accumulated Amortization | ($92,636) | ($97,785) | ($102,933) |
Other Assets | $44,739 | $54,801 | $64,862 |
Total Assets | $937,115 | $977,074 | $1,017,032 |
Liabilities | |||
Current Liabilities | |||
Accounts Payable | $68,350 | $74,749 | $81,149 |
Current Long Term Debt due | $9,333 | $9,833 | $10,333 |
Total Current Liabilities | $77,683 | $84,583 | $91,482 |
Long Term Debt | $99,667 | $120,667 | $141,667 |
Other Liabilities | $12,726 | $13,339 | $13,951 |
Deferred Long Term Liability Charges | $82,184 | $51,102 | $20,020 |
Minority Interest | $1,202 | $1,479 | $1,756 |
Total Liabilities | $273,461 | $271,168 | $268,875 |
Preferred Stock (par $100, yield 8% and 1.25 million shares) | $125,000 | $125,000 | $125,000 |
Stockholders' Equity | |||
Common Stock ( Class A owners,20 million shares) | $98,575 | $74,435 | $47,318 |
Retained Earnings | $429,870 | $475,818 | $524,743 |
Treasury Stock | $0 | $0 | $0 |
Capital Surplus | $128,902 | $146,830 | $164,758 |
Other Stockholder Equity | $6,307 | $8,822 | $11,337 |
Total Stockholder Equity | $663,654 | $705,905 | $748,157 |
Total Liabilities and Equity | $937,116 | $977,074 | $1,017,032 |
Table 4- Income Statement (in thousands) | 31-Dec-13 | 31-Dec-14 | 31-Dec-15 |
Total Revenue | $1,030,798 | $1,083,793 | $1,136,788 |
Cost of Revenue | $550,044 | $579,578 | $609,112 |
Gross Profit | $480,754 | $504,215 | $527,676 |
Selling General and Administrative | $262,895 | $272,787 | $282,680 |
Others | $92,636 | $97,785 | $102,933 |
Operating Income or Loss | $125,223 | $133,643 | $142,063 |
Total Other Income/Expenses Net | $4,100 | $5,055 | $6,010 |
Earnings Before Interest And Taxes | $121,123 | $128,588 | $136,053 |
Interest Expense | $648 | $789 | $930 |
Income Before Tax | $120,474 | $127,798 | $135,122 |
Income Tax Expense | ($48,190) | ($51,119) | ($54,049) |
Minority Interest | ($898) | ($1,039) | ($1,180) |
Net Income From Continuing Ops | $71,387 | $75,640 | $79,893 |
Net Income | $71,387 | $75,640 | $79,893 |
Table 5- Trucking Industry Peer group | Stock Symbol | Stock Market Capital | Recent Stock price | Enterprise Value | Total Debt | Equity Beta |
| ||||||
|
| (Mil. $) | ($) | (Mil. $) | (Mil. $) | |
Universal Truckload Services | UACL | 838 | 29 | 1060 | 242 | 1.64 |
Celadon Group | CGI | 529 | 22.73 | 804 | 321 | 1.35 |
Covenant Transportation group | CVTI | 392 | 26.18 | 626 | 223 | 1.35 |
Heartland Express | HTLD | 2410 | 22.47 | 2240 | 21 | 0.47 |
JB Hunt Transport Services Inc | JBHT | 9950 | 1027 | 8920 | 840 | 0.91 |
Knight Transportation | KNX | 3300 | 75.43 | 1870 | 38 | 0.81 |
Landstar System | LSTR | 3300 | 74.53 | 3280 | 30 | 0.7 |
USA Truck | USAK | 268 | 25.58 | 350 | 114 | 1.75 |
Werner Enterprises | WERN | 225 | 221 | 1860 | 75 | 0.92 |
Marten Transport | MRTN | 741 | 22.19 | 712 | 25 | 1.07 |
Table 6- Energy Industry Peer group | Stock Symbol | Stock Market Capital | Recent Stock Price | Enterprise Value
| Total Debt |
Equity Beta |
| ||||||
|
| (Mil. $) | ($) | (Mil. $) | (Mil. $) | |
Arch Coal | ACI | 982 | 5 | 4950 | 5150 | 1.97 |
Alpha Natural Resources | ANR | 935 | 4 | 3420 | 3430 | 0.48 |
CONSOL Energy | CNX | 9340 | 41 | 1219 | 3180 | 1.13 |
Cameo Corp | CCJ | 8970 | 23 | 1064 | 1410 | 1.2 |
Peabody Energy | BTU | 4360 | 16 | 9840 | 6000 | 1.5 |
Westmoreland Coal | WLB | 420 | 28 | 695 | 340 | 0.11 |
Alliance Holdings Group LP | AHGP | 3650 | 61 | 4400 | 886 | 0.51 |
Alliance Resources Partners | ARLP | 3080 | 83 | 3830 | 886 | 0.65 |
Cloud Peak Energy | CLD | 1260 | 21 | 1630 | 720 | 1.7 |
Walter Energy Inc. | WALT | 463 | 7 | 2980 | 2780 | 1.56 |
TABLE 7 Total Annual Returns, 1926-2013
Investment | Average Return | Risk Premium |
Large Stocks | 11.70% | 8.00% |
Small Stocks | 16.70% | 13.00% |
Long-term Corporate Bonds | 6.20% | 2.50% |
Long-term Government Bonds | 5.90% | 2.20% |
U.S. Treasury Bills | 3.70% | 0.00% |
Table 8- US Treasury Bonds Rates- December, 2016 | ||||
Maturity | Yield | Yesterday | Last Week | Last Month |
3 Month | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
6 Month | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
2 Year | 0.45 | 0.4 | 0.42 | 0.3 |
3 Year | 0.91 | 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.67 |
5 Year | 1.73 | 1.69 | 1.71 | 1.47 |
10 Year | 2.8 | 2.68 | 2.74 | 2.66 |
20 Year | 3.6 | 3.53 | 3.61 | 3.63 |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started