Question
On June 30, 2009, Martin Hendrickson and Solveig Hendrickson were married, and on January 3, 2010, a home previously owned by Martin was conveyed to
On June 30, 2009, Martin Hendrickson and Solveig Hendrickson were married, and on January 3, 2010, a home previously owned by Martin was conveyed to them as joint tenants and not as tenants in common. Solveig Hendrickson paid no part of the consideration for the premises. On August 3, 2017, Martin Hendrickson duly executed a Declaration of Election to Sever Survivorship of Joint Tenancy by which he endeavored to preserve an interest in the premises for Ruth Halbert, his daughter by a previous marriage. On the same day, he executed his last will and testament, by the terms of which he directed that his wife, Solveig Hendrickson, receive the minimum amount to which she was entitled under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Martin Hendrickson died with a valid will on October 9, 2017.
(a)What are the arguments that the joint ownership was severed by Martin Hendrickson's declaration thus creating a tenancy in common?
(b)What are the arguments that the joint tenancy was not severed by Martin Hendrickson's declaration and thus the property passed to Solveig Hendrickson by survivorship upon Martin Hendrickson's death?
(c)Which argument should prevail? Explain.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started