On p. 29-30 of Human Nature: A Reader, Socrates is discussing justice with his friend Polemarchus. Polemarchus has claimed that justice is benefitting one's friends and harming one's enemies. Socrates disagrees. Explain Socrates objection to this claim, his way of supporting his objection, and the consequences that Socrates' position has for the concepts of revenge, correction and rehabilitation. The one that makes horses good. And when dogs are harmed, they become worse in the virtue that makes dos mod not horses? Necessarily. then won't we say the same about human beings, too, that when they are harmed they become worse in human virtue? Indeed. But isn't justice human virtue? Yes, certainly Then people who are harmed must become more unjust? So it seems Can musicians make people unmusical through music They cannot Or horsemen make people unhorsemanlike through horsemanship? No. Well, then can those who are just make people unjust through justice? In a word, can those who are good make people bad through Virtue? They cannot it isn't the function of heat to cool things but of its opposite Yes. Nor the function of dryness to make things wet but of its opposite Indeed. Nor the function of goodness to harm but of its opposite? Apparently And a just person is good? Indeed. Then, Polemarchus, it isn't the function of a just person to harm a friend or anyone else, rather it is the function of his opposite, an unjust person? In my view that's completely true. Socrates If anyone tells us, then that it is just to give to each what he's owed and understands by this that a just man should harm his enemies and benefit his friends, he isn't wise to say it, since what he says isn't true, for it has become dear to us that it is never just to harm anyone? Tagree* (Human Nature: A Reader p. 29-30). this tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window Load Individual Assignment 4: Examining an argument about a new window ore on the following topic: On p. 29-30 of Human Nature: A Reader, Socrates is discussing justice with his friend Polemarchus. Polemarchus has claimed that justice is benefitting one's friends and harming one's enemies. Socrates disagrees. Explain Socrates objection to this dalim his way of supporting his objection, and the consequences that Socrates position has for the concepts of revenge. correction and rehabilitation I have included the text here in case you don't have the book. In the passage Socrates is the main speaker Socrates: "So you want us to add something to what we said before about justice, when we said that it is just to treat friends well and enemies badly. You want us to add to this that it is just to treat well a friend who is good and to harm an enemy who is bad? Right. That seems fine to me Is it, then the role of a just man to harm anyone? Certainly, he must harm those who are both bad and enemies Do horses become better or worse when they are harmed? Worse. With respect to the virtue that makes dogs good or the one that makes horses good? The one that makes horses good. And when dogs are harmed, they become worse in the virtue that makes dogs good, not horses? Necessarily. then won't we say the same about human beings, too, that when they are harmed they become worse in human virtue? Indeed. But isn't justice human virtue? Yes, certainly Then people who are harmed must become more unjust? So it seems Can musicians make people unmusical through music? They cannot Or horsemen make people unhorsemanlike through horsemanship? No Well, then, can those who are just make people unjust through justice? In a word, can those who are good make people bad through virtue? They cannot It isn't the function of heat to cool things but of its opposite? Yes Nor the function of dryness to make things wet but of its opposite? Indeed Nor the function of goodness to harm but of its opposite? Apparently On p. 29-30 of Human Nature: A Reader, Socrates is discussing justice with his friend Polemarchus. Polemarchus has claimed that justice is benefitting one's friends and harming one's enemies. Socrates disagrees. Explain Socrates objection to this claim, his way of supporting his objection, and the consequences that Socrates' position has for the concepts of revenge, correction and rehabilitation. The one that makes horses good. And when dogs are harmed, they become worse in the virtue that makes dos mod not horses? Necessarily. then won't we say the same about human beings, too, that when they are harmed they become worse in human virtue? Indeed. But isn't justice human virtue? Yes, certainly Then people who are harmed must become more unjust? So it seems Can musicians make people unmusical through music They cannot Or horsemen make people unhorsemanlike through horsemanship? No. Well, then can those who are just make people unjust through justice? In a word, can those who are good make people bad through Virtue? They cannot it isn't the function of heat to cool things but of its opposite Yes. Nor the function of dryness to make things wet but of its opposite Indeed. Nor the function of goodness to harm but of its opposite? Apparently And a just person is good? Indeed. Then, Polemarchus, it isn't the function of a just person to harm a friend or anyone else, rather it is the function of his opposite, an unjust person? In my view that's completely true. Socrates If anyone tells us, then that it is just to give to each what he's owed and understands by this that a just man should harm his enemies and benefit his friends, he isn't wise to say it, since what he says isn't true, for it has become dear to us that it is never just to harm anyone? Tagree* (Human Nature: A Reader p. 29-30). this tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window Load Individual Assignment 4: Examining an argument about a new window ore on the following topic: On p. 29-30 of Human Nature: A Reader, Socrates is discussing justice with his friend Polemarchus. Polemarchus has claimed that justice is benefitting one's friends and harming one's enemies. Socrates disagrees. Explain Socrates objection to this dalim his way of supporting his objection, and the consequences that Socrates position has for the concepts of revenge. correction and rehabilitation I have included the text here in case you don't have the book. In the passage Socrates is the main speaker Socrates: "So you want us to add something to what we said before about justice, when we said that it is just to treat friends well and enemies badly. You want us to add to this that it is just to treat well a friend who is good and to harm an enemy who is bad? Right. That seems fine to me Is it, then the role of a just man to harm anyone? Certainly, he must harm those who are both bad and enemies Do horses become better or worse when they are harmed? Worse. With respect to the virtue that makes dogs good or the one that makes horses good? The one that makes horses good. And when dogs are harmed, they become worse in the virtue that makes dogs good, not horses? Necessarily. then won't we say the same about human beings, too, that when they are harmed they become worse in human virtue? Indeed. But isn't justice human virtue? Yes, certainly Then people who are harmed must become more unjust? So it seems Can musicians make people unmusical through music? They cannot Or horsemen make people unhorsemanlike through horsemanship? No Well, then, can those who are just make people unjust through justice? In a word, can those who are good make people bad through virtue? They cannot It isn't the function of heat to cool things but of its opposite? Yes Nor the function of dryness to make things wet but of its opposite? Indeed Nor the function of goodness to harm but of its opposite? Apparently