Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
On September 11, 2015, a crawler crane toppled over onto the Masjid al-Haram, the Grand Mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, killing 111 people and injuring
On September 11, 2015, a crawler crane toppled over onto the Masjid al-Haram, the Grand Mosque in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, killing 111 people and injuring 394. The weather was unusually not good on the day incident happened, and even one hour before, a forecast was announced that there would be medium to heavy rainfalls in the city. After the incident, an anonymous engineer A, i.e., said that this is an act of GOD, and there is no technical failure.
How do you analyze this incident with respect to ethical theories in engineering profession? Do you think that company was fulfilling the engineering professional obligation or it was really an act of GOD as said by engineer A? Analyze the statement by the engineer A and response of the company with respect to moral, NSPE code, and Islamic ethics. Does the response of the company was also exhibiting highest ethics in the engineering profession?
If you were an engineer in the company, would you have done an internal or external whistle blowing to avoid this kind of incident? Does any conflict of interest was involved in this issue in your opinion? Also, do you think the statement passed by the engineer A is also a result of conflict of interest? Justify all your answers with solid reasoning.
Study and Summerize the above real-life engineering dilemma in not more than 8 pages
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started