On the Costs of Being Nice

Agreeable people tend to be kinder and more accommodating in social situation, which you might think could add to their success in life. However, one downside of agreeableness is potentially lower earnings. Research has shown the answer to this and other puzzles; some of them may surprise you.

First, and perhaps most obvious, agreeable individuals are less adept at a type of negotiation called distributive bargaining. As we discuss in Chapter 14, distributive bargaining is less about creating win-win solutions and more about claiming as large of a share of the pie as possible. Because salary negotiations are generally distributive, agreeable individuals often negotiate lower salaries

for themselves than they might otherwise get. Perhaps because of this impaired ability to negotiate distributively, agreeable individuals have lower credit scores.

Second, agreeable individuals may choose to work in industries or occupations that earn lower salaries, such as the "caring" industries of education or health care. Agreeable individuals are also attracted to jobs both in the public sector and in nonprofit organizations.

Third, the earnings of agreeable individuals also may be reduced by their lower drive to emerge as leaders and by their tendency to engage in lower degrees of proactive task behaviors, such as coming up with ways to increase organizational effectiveness.

While being agreeable certainly doesn't appear to help one's pay, it does provide other benefits. Agreeable individuals are better liked at work, are more likely to help others at work, and generally are happier at work and in life.

Nice guys - and gals - may finish last in terms of earnings, but wages themselves do not define a happy life, and on that front, agreeable individuals have the advantage.

Questions

1.Do you think employers must choose between agreeable employees and top performers? Why or why not?

2.Often, the effects of personality depend on the situation. Can you think of some job situations in which agreeableness is an important virtue, and some in which it is harmful to job performance?

3.In some research we've conducted, we've found that the negative effect of agreeableness on earnings is stronger for men than for women (that is. being agreeable hurt men's earnings more than women's). Why do you think this might be the case?

My requirement, I want,

1.New Title for the above case

2.Rewrite the "summary" of the above case

3.Analysis of the case

4.Problem identification(those 1, 2 and 3 questions are already mentioned)

5.Solution to these above problem (point number 4, answer of these question number 1, 2 and 3)

6.Recommendation

All these points should be in detailed explanation