Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

On the morning of Sunday, April 8, 2013, Facebook Inc.'s youthful chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, alerted his board of directors that he intended to buy

On the morning of Sunday, April 8, 2013, Facebook Inc.'s youthful chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, alerted his board of directors that he intended to buy Instagram, the hot photo- sharing service. It was the first the board heard of what, later that day, would become Facebook's largest acquisition ever, according to several people familiar with the matter. Mr. Zuckerberg and his counterpart at Instagram, Kevin Systrom, had already been talking over the deal for three days, these people said. Negotiating mostly on his own, Mr. Zuckerberg had fielded Mr. Systrom's opening number, $2 billion, and whittled it down over several meetings at Mr. Zuckerberg's $7 million five-bedroom home in Palo Alto. Later that Sunday, the two 20-somethings would agree on a sale valued at $1 billion. It was a remarkably speedy three-day path to a deal for Facebooka young company taking pains to portray itself as blue-chip ahead of its initial public offering of stock in a few weeks that could value it at up to $100 billion. Companies generally prefer to bring in ranks of lawyers and bankers to scrutinize a deal before proceeding, a process that can eat up days or weeks. Mr. Zuckerberg ditched all that. By the time Facebook's board was brought in, the deal was all but done. The board, according to one person familiar with the matter, "Was told, not consulted." Mr. Zuckerberg owns 28% of Facebook's stock, and controls 57% of its voting rights, giving him the freedom to act independently if he wants. Mr. Systrom, similarly, owns about 45% of his company. That control means investors must accept the fact that the CEOs can move quickly. Advocates argue this can be an asset in an industryonline services and social networking where competitive threats can emerge with lightning speed. In the Instagram deal, one of Mr. Zuckerberg's concerns was Mr. Systrom might have reacted negatively had he approached him through lawyers, people familiar with the matter said. Facebook's CEO got a hand from Amin Zoufonoun, Facebook's director of corporate development, to hammer out details later in the talks, a person familiar with the matter said. These sorts of fast decisions, commonplace among scrappy, private start-ups, get trickier in the more structured world of multibillion-dollar public corporations where Facebook will soon operate. "You want the board to provide caution to the CEO,'' said Ralph A. Walkling, executive director of the Center for Corporate Governance at Drexel University's business school. "They are the last line of defense for minority shareholders.'' Facebook's board did vote on the deal, according to people familiar with the matter, though it was largely symbolic. Facebook's chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, learned the Thursday before the deal from Mr. Zuckerberg that he intended to push to acquire Instagram, though she wasn't directly involved in the negotiations, according to a person familiar with the matter. Ms. Sandberg, 42 years old, joined Facebook from Google Inc. in 2008 in part to provide more professional executive support to the company's CEO. Mr. Zuckerberg's handling of the Instagram acquisition is a reminder that Facebook is still in some respects a one-man show. The three-day sprint to the deal started on April 5, when Mr. Zuckerberg picked up the phone and asked Mr. Systrom to meet. At the time, Mr. Systrom was just hours from signing a deal for a $50 million venture-capital investment that would put a $500 million value on his company, which had just 13 employees and no revenue. Mr. Zuckerberg had been interested in acquiring Instagram since the previous summer and had decided it was time to do a deal. That night, the two CEOs met at Mr. Zuckerberg's home in Palo Alto's Crescent Park neighborhood. Wall Street's traditional rules for valuing companies offer little help in putting a number on a company like Instagram. While the start-up, just 18 months old, had no revenue, its fast growth gave Mr. Systrom leverage. His company is strong where Facebook has been weakon devices like the iPhoneand took aim squarely at Facebook users' favorite activity, sharing photos. Instagram makes a smartphone "app" that lets people take photos, dress them up with special effects, and easily share them with friends. In the first three months of 2013, its user base nearly doubled, to about 30 million, the company says. After Instagram released a version of its app for phones powered by Google Inc.'s Android software on April 3, the user base shot up again, to around 35 million at the time of the Facebook deal. Mr. Zuckerberg was particularly concerned when he saw millions of people signing up for the Android app, people familiar with the matter said. One concern: Facebook was falling behind in mobile as younger start-ups were innovating more quickly. In the past, Facebook's acquisitions were primarily about bringing in talented engineers. Once Mr. Zuckerberg identified the people he wanted, he typically let others in the company work out the details. This time, however, he took the lead himself. "Mark spent the time that weekend," said Steve Anderson, a founding partner of venture firm Baseline Ventures, Instagram's first investor. "It was a real statement to Kevin of the importance of why Mark wanted to do it." The two CEOs began their talks Thursday night at Mr. Zuckerberg's remodeled, century-old home, and met there again Friday and Saturday, wrapping up with a 12-hour session on Sunday, people familiar with the matter said. Each night, Mr. Systrom drove back to his house in San Francisco, one of the people said. Instagram launched on Oct. 6, 2010. On its first day, it garnered around 25,000 users. By May 2011, it hit 3.75 million. That fast growth attracted suitors early onincluding an outreach from Twitter Inc. in early 2011 and from Mr. Zuckerberg that summer, people familiar with the matter said. But Mr. Systrom rebuffed them, intent on building his own company. Now, however, Mr. Systrom found himself in Mr. Zuckerberg's house asking $2 billion for Instagram. Mr. Zuckerberg suggested looking at the value of Instagram as a percentage of the value of Facebook, people familiar with the matter said. Mr. Zuckerberg, who planned to pay for Instagram mostly with stock, asked Mr. Systrom what he thought Facebook would be worth, the people said. If he believed Facebook would one day be worth as much as a company like Google at $200 billion or more, then the equivalent of 1% of Facebook would be sufficient to meet his price, Mr. Zuckerberg told Mr. Systrom, the people said. It was as good an argument as any, considering that traditional ways of valuing a companyby its cash flow, or the sum of its partsare ineffective when that company makes only one product and gives it away free. Mr. Zuckerberg also offered Mr. Systrom assurances that Instagram could remain independent under Facebook. On Saturday and Sunday, Facebook's Mr. Zoufonoun helped hammer out the details at Mr. Zuckerberg's home. Mr. Zoufonoun declined to comment through a Facebook spokesman. The arguments were working. Mr. Systrom was on the phone with his investors Sunday as he drove down to Palo Alto around noon for what would be a final day of negotiations, according to a person familiar with the matter. Early that day, Mr. Zuckerberg emailed his board to say a deal was close, people familiar with the matter said. At around 6 p.m. that evening, Facebook board member Marc Andreessen showed up at Mr. Zuckerberg's house for a regular meeting. What he didn't know was that Mr. Systrom was in another room, getting his own board to sign off, people familiar with the matter said. Mr. Andreessen, whose venture-capital firm was the second to invest in Instagram, cutting a $250,000 check before the service launched, was surprised when Mr. Systrom walked into the room about an hour into his meeting with Mr. Zuckerberg, the people said. After the CEOs told their boards a deal had been reached, Instagram's investors circulated congratulatory emails, a person familiar with the matter said. And a day later, Mr. Zuckerberg returned to Instagram, a service he hadn't used since the previous June, posting a photo on Instagram of his white Hungarian Puli, named Beast, "sleeping off the edge of the bed."

Did Facebook's directors violate their fiduciary duty to its shareholders?Consider the relevance of the Bainbridge reading and the Commonsense Principles of Corporate Governance

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Public Law Text Cases And Materials

Authors: Andrew Le Sueur, Maurice Sunkin, Jo Eric Khushal Murkens

4th Edition

0198820283, 978-0198820284

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions