One way to strategically examine a company's portfolio products is to categorize them into four distinctive groups in what is commonly called a "growth-share matrix." These four groups are: "Cash cows" which are products with high share in markets with low predicted growth where companies leverage them for cash to reinvest "Stars" which are products with high share in markets with high predicted growth where companies should significantly invest in them due to high future potential "Question marks" which are products with low share in markets with high predicted growth where companies should invest in or discard them based on the likelihood of becoming stars "Pets" which are products with low share in markets with low predicted growth where companies should liquidate, divest, or reposition them I want to apply this framework to better understand Chester's product portfolio because they are one of our key competitors. Of Chester's products, which one is a "cash cow" and which one is a "star"?