ONLY 11-7 & 11-10

11-7 Parts a (NPV and IRR only), b & c

11-10 NPV and IRR for the projects

11-7 CAPIT this ye Projec Projec a. Calculate NPV, IRR, MIRR, payback, and discounted payback for each project. b. Assuming the projects are independent, which one(s) would you recommend? c. If the projects are mutually exclusive, which would you recommend? d. Notice that the projects have the same cash flow timing pattern. Why is there a conflict between NPV and IRR? 11-8 CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation. b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated? c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation? 11-9 CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS An electric utility is considering a new power plant in northern Arizona. Power from the plant would be sold in the Phoenix area, where it is badly needed. Because the firm has received a permit, the plant would be legal; but it would cause some air pollution. The company could spend an additional $40 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. The plant without mitigation would cost $240 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $80 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $84 million. Unemployment in the area where the plant would be built is high, and the plant would provide about 350 good jobs. The risk-adjusted WACC is 17%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with and without mitigation. b. How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? c. Should this project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do the mitigation? -10 CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE PROJECTS A firm with a WACC of 10% is considering the following mutually exclusive projects