Question
On-Site Testing Service has received four investment proposals for consideration. Two of the proposals, X1 and X2 are mutually exclusive. The other two proposals, Y1
On-Site Testing Service has received four investment proposals for consideration. Two of the proposals, X1 and X2 are mutually exclusive. The other two proposals, Y1 and Y2 are also mutually exclusive. Proposal Y1 is contingent on X1, and Y2 is contingent on X2. Other than these restrictions, any combination of proposals (including null) is feasible. MARR is 7.00%/year. The expected cash flows for the proposals are shown below. A present worth analysis is to be conducted.
End of year
| X1 | X2 | Y1 | Y2 |
0 | -$11000 | -$14,000 | -$6000 | -$6000 |
1 through 8 | $2400 | $1800 | $2900 | $3500 |
a. How many alternatives are possible (feasible and non-feasible)?
b. Use present worth analysis to determine which (if any) proposals On-Site Testing should accept
None ?
X2 and Y2?
X1 only ?
X2 only ?
X1 and Y1?
c. From computation in part b., what is the present worth of the accepted proposal?
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started