Our firm represents Jim Smith, who is suing his former employer under this statute. Jim worked in a pet store. Jim claims that his coworkers would often call him a name - in French - during work hours. The word they used can have two meanings. It is both a derogatory term for homosexuals, and it can also mean "umbrella." On behalf of Jim, we are claiming that his employer violated this statute by allowing Jim to be subjected to a "hostile work environment," in which he had to endure hearing this potentially derogatory word all day long. Please find a case that answers the following question: Is the use of a word that has two meanings (one meaning is neutral; the other is meant as an insult) by Jim's co-workers good evidence in support of a hostile work environment claim