Our text mentions several fallacies and pitfalls encountered when trying to measure performance. Mark Twain popularized the saying "There are three kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics". A more modern list is "Lies, Damned Lies, and Benchmarks". Both sayings comment on the ability to say anything with numbers. Our text lists among its pitfalls "Using a subset of the performance equation as a performance metric". Consider two processors, P1 and P2. P1 has a clock rate of 4GHz, average CPI of 0.9, and requires the execution of 5.0E9 instructions. P2 has a clock rate of 3GHz, average CPI of 0.7, and requires the execution of 1.0E9 instructions. a) One fallacy is to consider the processor with the fastest clock has having the highest performance. (Look how prominently computer vendors mention the clock rate). Check if this is true for these two processors. b) If we have P1 execute 1.0E9 instructions (like P2 does), and we do not change the CPI for either processor, determine the number of instructions that P2 can execute in the same time as P1 executes its 1.0Eg instructions. c) During the 1980 s people often used MIPS (millions of instructions per second) to compare the performance of different computers. The machine with the larger MIPS score would be considered faster. Check if this is true for these two processors. (Recall that you measured performance in part a)