Question
Outdoor Technologies (an Australian company) was involved in a contract dispute with Silver Star Limited (a Chinese company).Outdoor prevailed in the litigation in the Australian
Outdoor Technologies (an Australian company) was involved in a contract dispute with Silver Star Limited (a Chinese company).Outdoor prevailed in the litigation in the Australian courts and obtained a judgment for $500,000.00 against Silver Star (a Chinese company) from the Australian courts.Silver Star owned property in Iowa, so Outdoor filed suit in Iowa to enforce and collect the Australian judgment.Which of the following statements is true?(A) Outdoor cannot collect in the United States a judgment that was issued by an Australian court.(B) Outdoor cannot collect in the United States because Silver Star is not an American company.(C) Outdoor can collect in the United States if the proceeding in the Australian courts was fair and proper.(D) Outdoor can collect in the United States, because both the United States and Australia have common law systems.
Answer:_____Explanation:
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started