Over the past several years' decommissioned U S. warships have been turned into artificial reefs in the ocean by towing them out to sea and sinking them The thinking was that sinking the ship would conveniently dispose of it while prowding an artificial reef enVironment for aquatic life In reality, some ofthe sunken ships have released toxms into the ocean and have been costly to decontaminate. Now the U 5. government is taking bids to instead dismantle and recycle ships that have recently been decommissioned (but have not been sunk yet.) Assume that a recently decommissmned aircra carrier. the USS Hudek' is estimated to contain approximately 40 tons of recyclable materials able to be sold for apprOXImately S42 5 million. The low bid for dismantling and transporting the ship materials to appropriate facilities is S43 6 million. Recycling and dismantling the ship would create about 500 jobs for about a year in the Rust Belt. This geographic area has been experienCing recordshigh unemployment rates in recent years. Lentmrernents Requirement 1. Is it more financially advantageous to sink the ship (assume that it costs apprOXimately $0 6 million to tow a ship out to sea and sink it) or to dismantle and recycle it? Show your calculations. (Enter dollar amounts in millions.) U.S. Government Financial Decision Cost to dismantle and recycle Bid price Less scrap value Cost to sink Net difference in favour (against) of Sinking FinanCially. it is more advantageous to V the ship Requirement 2. From a sustainability standpoint, what should be done with the decommissioned aircraft carrier? List some of the qualitative factors that should enter into this analysis. From a sustainability standpoint, the decommissioned aircraft carrier should be The following qualitative factors should be considered into this analysis. 1) 2) 3 Requirement 3. As a taxpayer, which action would you prefer (sink or recycle)? A taxpayer would prefer to the aircraft carrier because this option and