Over the past two years, Kermit Stone, the controller of Hilton Company, has been concerned that the company has been paying a large amount of money for state unemployment taxes. On reviewing the "unemployment file" with head accountant, Deborah Murtha, he learns that the company's tax rate is near the top of the range of the state's experience-rating system. After calling the local unemployment office, Stone realizes that the turnover of employees at Hilton Company has had an adverse effect on the company's tax rates. In addition, after consulting with Murtha, he discovers that the eligibility reports that come from the state unemployment office are just signed and sent back to the state without any review. The eligibility reports are notices that an ex-employee has filed a claim for unemployment benefits. By signing these reports "blindly," the company, in effect, tells the state that the employee is eligible for the benefits. Any benefits paid are charged by the state against Hilton Company's account. Stone is convinced that the rates the company is paying are too high, and he feels that part of the reason is the "blind" signing of eligibility reports. Besides this, he wonders what other steps the company can take to lower its contributions rate and taxes. What are some recommendations that might help Stone reduce the "unfair" burden that the unemployment compensation taxes are leveling on Hilton Company?