Pamela wants to buy Dirk's house.Dirk knows his house has water damage in the basement, so he paints over the basement walls and replaces the basement carpet before Pamela views the house to hide the water damage.Pamela has a reasonable inspection does, which does not find water damage since Dirk has covered it up.After signing a contract to purchase the house, Pamela discovers the water damage, and she wants to sue Dirk for fraudulent misrepresentation.If Pamela wants to void the contract, what 3 elements must she prove in her case against Dirk?How will she argue that each of the 3 elements is satisfied?