Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

PASTE INTO EXCEL AND USE THE DATA ANALYSIS ADD-IN TO PERFORM REGRESSIONS ON THE MODELS TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS Download the State Crime Excel sheet;

PASTE INTO EXCEL AND USE THE DATA ANALYSIS ADD-IN TO PERFORM REGRESSIONS ON THE MODELS TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS

Download the State Crime Excel sheet; row 2 gives detailed descriptions of each variable, while row 4 gives short versions that should be used in your regressions. Estimate the following multiple regression models (remember that all of your independent variables will have to be in adjacent columns in Excel). Look at each set of results critically and consider how you would interpret the strengths and weaknesses of each model. Save your results from each model for use when completing the end-of-module assessment. Use Burglary as your dependent variable in each model. The notation f(X,Y,Z) means a function of X, Y, Z; i.e., X, Y, and Z are your independent variables. Even though it isnt listed, each model will include an intercept.

NOTE: when Excel reports a value like 2.4E-06, this is scientific notation for 2.410?6, or 0.0000024. Model A: Burglary = f(Population, PerCapIncome, %Poverty) Model B: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %young) Model C: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %youngmale) Model D: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %youngfemale) Model E: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Rain, MedianAge, %Metro) Model F: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Temp, MedianAge, %Metro) Model G: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Sun, MedianAge, %Metro)

Question 19 Answer saved Marked out of 1.00 Remove flag Question text

In model A, how much of the variation in burglary is explained by population, per capita income, and % below the poverty line? Select one: a. 27.5% b. 44.8% c. 65.4% d. 55.2% Question 20 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text

In model A, how would you interpret the coefficient for % poverty? Select one: a. As % below the poverty line increases by 27.6, the burglary rate increases by about 1. b. As the burglary rate increases by 1, % below the poverty line increases by 27.6. c. As % below the poverty line increases by 1, the burglary rate increases by about 27.6. d. As the burglary rate increases by 27.6, % below the poverty line increases by 8.88. Question 21 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text

Download the State Crime Excel sheet; row 2 gives detailed descriptions of each variable, while row 4 gives short versions that should be used in your regressions. Estimate the following multiple regression models (remember that all of your independent variables will have to be in adjacent columns in Excel). Look at each set of results critically and consider how you would interpret the strengths and weaknesses of each model. Save your results from each model for use when completing the end-of-module assessment. Use Burglary as your dependent variable in each model. The notation f(X,Y,Z) means a function of X, Y, Z; i.e., X, Y, and Z are your independent variables. Even though it isnt listed, each model will include an intercept. NOTE: when Excel reports a value like 2.4E-06, this is scientific notation for 2.410?6, or 0.0000024.

Model A: Burglary = f(Population, PerCapIncome, %Poverty)

Model B: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %young)

Model C: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %youngmale)

Model D: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %youngfemale)

Model E: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Rain, MedianAge, %Metro)

Model F: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Temp, MedianAge, %Metro)

Model G: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Sun, MedianAge, %Metro)

Question 19

Answer saved

Marked out of 1.00

Remove flag

Question text

In model A, how much of the variation in burglary is explained by population, per capita income, and % below the poverty line?

Select one:

a. 27.5%

b. 44.8%

c. 65.4%

d. 55.2%

Question 20

Not yet answered

Marked out of 1.00

Flag question

Question text

In model A, how would you interpret the coefficient for % poverty?

Select one:

a. As % below the poverty line increases by 27.6, the burglary rate increases by about 1.

b. As the burglary rate increases by 1, % below the poverty line increases by 27.6.

c. As % below the poverty line increases by 1, the burglary rate increases by about 27.6.

d. As the burglary rate increases by 27.6, % below the poverty line increases by 8.88.

Question 21

Not yet answered

Marked out of 1.00

Flag question

Question text

In model A, the coefficient for population is statistically significant at the 10% level.

Select one:

True

False

Question 22

Not yet answered

Marked out of 1.00

Flag question

Question text

In models B through D, what seems to be the relationship between the burglary rate and the percent of the 18-64 population who are young adults (18-24)?

Select one:

a. It is difficult to describe the relationship; the young adult variables were all significant at 5% in models B, C, and D, but the signs and sizes of the coefficients were very different between models.

b. Conclusions about the relationship between young adults and the burglary rate are difficult to draw since the unemployment rate variable is consistently positive and significant, which reduces the reliability of the estimates for the young adult variables.

c. The burglary rate seems to increase as the proportion of young adults increases (models B, C, and D), though the effect is only significant (at the 10% level) for young adult males (model C).

d. We can be confident that the relationship between the burglary rate and proportion of young adults is negative, given the signs of the young adult coefficients in all models and the high adjusted R-square values.

Question 23

Not yet answered

Marked out of 1.00

Flag question

Question text

In models B through D, the relationship between the unemployment rate and the burglary rate

Select one:

a. is unimportant since, even though it was statistically significant and of the expected sign, its coefficient estimates were always smaller than the young adult coefficients.

b. cannot be assumed to be different from zero since unemployment was insignificant in all models. This data seem to show that the unemployment rate has no effect on the burglary rate.

c. seems relatively stable at about a 60-unit increase in the burglary rate for every 1% increase in the unemployment rate.

d. is expected to be negative, so the only reliable model is C since it has the largest negative coefficient for the intercept. Models B and D, with smaller negative intercept coefficients, should not be used to draw inferences about unemployment and burglary.

Question 24

Not yet answered

Marked out of 1.00

Flag question

Question text

Of all the variables in models E through G, the % in a metro area is the only one that is statistically insignificant (at the 10% level) in all models.

Select one:

True

False

Question 25

Not yet answered

Marked out of 1.00

Flag question

Question text

In model A, it was seen that per capita income was negative and significantly (at the 10% level) related to the burglary rate. In models E through G, the per capita income variable is

Select one:

a. still negatively related to the burglary rate, but is no longer significant at the 10% level.

b. more difficult to interpret since the adjusted R-squares in models E through G are higher with the different independent variables than in model A.

c. still significant, even at the 1% level, but the sign of the relationship has switched to being positively related to the burglary rate.

d. still negatively related to the burglary rate, and still significant even at the 1% level.

Question 26

Not yet answered

Marked out of 1.00

Flag question

Question text

In looking at models E and G, consistent with theory and logic, the burglary rate is negatively related to average rainfall and positively related to the number of sunny days.

Select one:

True

False

Question 27

Not yet answered

Marked out of 1.00

Flag question

Question text

The state of West Dakota currently has per capita income of $35,500, average annual temperature of 43.0 degrees, median age of 37.5 years, and 48.0% (or 0.48) of the population in a metro area. The state suddenly experiences an improvement in its economy, and increases its per capita income to $38,600. This improvement will likely be associated with the burglary rate changing from about 519 annual burgles to about ___ annual burgles (round your answer to the nearest whole number, no decimals).

Answer:

Table 5, Crime in the United States by State, Rate per 100,000 inhabitants Non-crime variables; units are as specified in row 2 descriptors
State Violent crime Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter Robbery Aggravated assault Property crime Burglary Larceny-theft Motor vehicle theft Total state population Per capita disposable personal income, $ unemployment rate, % average annual rainfall, inches average annual temperature, degrees F # of sunny days per year % below poverty line % 18-24/18-64, % of the 18-to-64 year old population that is a young adult (18-24 years old) % male 18-24/18-64, % of the 18-to-64 year old male population that is a young adult male (18-24 years old) % female 18-24/18-64, % of the 18-to-64 year old female population that is a young adult female (18-24 years old) Median age Median age, Male Median age, Female % 25 years old and older with a bachelor's degree % of state population living in a metropolitan area % living in same house one year ago
State Violent Murder Robbery Assault PropCrime Burglary Larceny CarTheft Population PerCapIncome %Unemploy Rain Temp Sun %Poverty %young %youngmale %youngfemale MedianAge MedAgeMale MedAgeFemale %Bachelors %Metro %SameHouse
ALABAMA 430.8 7.2 96.2 285.2 3,351.3 877.8 2,254.8 218.7 4,833,722 32448 7.2 58.3 62.8 99 16.2 16.2% 16.7% 15.8% 38.4 36.9 39.8 23.5% 76.0% 85.5
ARIZONA 416.5 5.4 101.1 263.9 3,399.1 732.4 2,403.5 263.2 6,626,624 32997 7.7 13.6 60.3 193 16.1 16.7% 17.3% 16.1% 36.8 35.5 38.1 27.4% 94.8% 81.7
ARKANSAS 460.3 5.4 76.3 330.5 3,602.6 1,030.1 2,380.6 191.9 2,959,373 32509 7.2 50.6 60.4 123 16 16.2% 16.6% 15.8% 37.7 36.3 39 20.6% 61.1% 84.2
CALIFORNIA 402.1 4.6 139.9 232.3 2,658.1 605.4 1,621.5 431.2 38,332,521 41932 8.9 22.2 59.4 146 13.9 16.4% 16.9% 16.0% 35.8 34.6 37 31.0% 97.8% 85.7
COLORADO 308.0 3.4 59.8 189.1 2,658.5 476.1 1,944.5 237.9 5,268,367 41137 6.9 15.9 45.1 136 8.5 15.0% 15.5% 14.6% 36.5 35.5 37.5 37.8% 87.0% 81.1
CONNECTICUT 262.5 2.4 98.2 135.4 1,974.1 358.5 1,442.6 173.0 3,596,080 53842 7.8 50.3 49 82 9.8 15.3% 16.0% 14.6% 40.6 38.8 42.1 37.2% 94.8% 87.8
DELAWARE 491.4 4.2 132.4 313.7 3,065.5 662.3 2,259.4 143.9 925,749 38891 6.7 45.7 55.3 97 11.6 16.0% 16.5% 15.6% 39.5 37.9 41 29.8% 100.0% 86.7
FLORIDA 470.4 5.0 118.7 312.3 3,105.3 710.5 2,216.3 178.6 19,552,860 36601 7.2 54.5 70.7 101 13 15.0% 15.6% 14.5% 41.5 40 42.9 27.2% 96.4% 83.9
GEORGIA 365.7 5.6 125.0 209.3 3,346.6 823.2 2,254.9 268.5 9,992,167 33111 8.2 50.7 63.5 112 15.4 16.0% 16.7% 15.4% 36 34.7 37.3 28.3% 82.3% 84
IDAHO 217.0 1.7 13.6 161.0 1,864.3 411.9 1,357.1 95.3 1,612,136 32348 6.1 18.9 44.4 120 11.1 16.3% 16.6% 16.0% 35.4 34.6 36.2 26.2% 66.2% 82.5
ILLINOIS 380.2 5.5 137.6 204.0 2,274.3 452.1 1,659.8 162.5 12,882,135 40584 9 39.2 51.8 95 12.1 15.5% 15.9% 15.0% 37.2 35.9 38.6 32.1% 88.3% 86.7
INDIANA 357.4 5.4 108.2 211.3 2,854.0 653.0 1,984.9 216.2 6,570,902 35171 7.6 41.7 51.7 88 11.8 16.5% 16.9% 16.1% 37.3 36 38.6 23.8% 77.6% 84.9
IOWA 271.4 1.4 30.4 204.6 2,193.9 513.5 1,543.0 137.4 3,090,416 38702 4.7 34 47.8 105 9.8 17.0% 17.4% 16.7% 38 36.6 39.4 26.4% 58.3% 84.6
KANSAS 339.9 3.9 46.6 248.1 2,946.8 600.4 2,117.0 229.5 2,893,957 41139 5.3 28.9 54.3 128 11.2 17.0% 17.6% 16.4% 36.1 34.8 37.4 31.1% 67.1% 83.5
KENTUCKY 209.8 3.8 73.9 95.5 2,362.9 596.4 1,629.3 137.2 4,395,295 31960 8 48.9 55.6 93 15.2 15.7% 16.1% 15.2% 38.4 37 39.8 22.6% 58.2% 84.5
LOUISIANA 518.5 10.8 119.9 352.8 3,582.0 890.4 2,493.6 198.0 4,625,470 36241 6.7 60.1 66.4 101 20.2 16.3% 16.7% 16.0% 36.1 34.8 37.4 22.5% 83.4% 86.5
MAINE 129.3 1.8 25.2 68.7 2,292.2 488.1 1,735.3 68.8 1,328,302 35617 6.7 42.2 41 101 12.7 13.8% 14.3% 13.3% 43.8 42.6 45 28.2% 58.8% 86.3
MARYLAND 473.8 6.4 169.5 272.0 2,663.5 538.9 1,898.3 226.3 5,928,814 45652 6.6 44.5 54.2 105 7.1 14.9% 15.6% 14.2% 38.3 36.6 39.8 37.4% 97.4% 86.5
MASSACHUSETTS 413.4 2.0 100.2 270.5 2,051.2 459.2 1,455.7 136.3 6,692,824 48472 6.7 47.7 47.9 98 9.6 16.1% 16.5% 15.8% 39.3 37.8 40.8 40.3% 98.5% 87.1
MICHIGAN 449.9 6.4 102.1 274.8 2,327.6 569.4 1,510.0 248.3 9,895,622 34853 8.8 32.8 44.4 71 11.1 16.5% 16.9% 16.0% 39.5 38.1 40.9 26.9% 81.8% 85.3
MINNESOTA 234.4 2.1 67.8 127.5 2,420.4 419.0 1,854.4 147.0 5,420,380 40924 5 27.3 41.2 95 8.7 15.0% 15.2% 14.8% 37.7 36.6 38.7 33.5% 77.2% 85.5
MISSISSIPPI 274.6 6.5 80.5 156.5 2,724.7 835.6 1,742.3 146.7 2,991,207 30608 8.5 59 63.4 111 21.1 17.1% 17.7% 16.6% 36.5 35 37.9 20.4% 45.5% 86.1
MISSOURI 433.4 6.1 90.7 298.7 3,137.0 643.0 2,223.9 270.1 6,044,171 35625 6.7 42.2 54.5 115 13 16.0% 16.4% 15.5% 38.2 36.7 39.6 27.0% 74.3% 84
MONTANA 252.9 2.2 20.1 190.2 2,556.5 400.3 1,974.0 182.2 1,015,165 35379 5.4 15.3 42.7 82 11.7 15.9% 16.5% 15.3% 39.9 38.7 41.1 29.0% 35.4% 83.5
NEBRASKA 262.1 3.1 55.7 160.5 2,623.4 476.3 1,908.2 238.9 1,868,516 41135 3.8 23.6 48.8 117 9.6 16.5% 16.8% 16.2% 36.2 35.1 37.4 29.4% 64.2% 83.9
NEVADA 603.0 5.8 185.8 360.6 2,837.7 826.0 1,653.4 358.3 2,790,136 34855 9.6 9.5 49.9 158 10.1 14.5% 14.6% 14.3% 37.3 36.7 37.9 22.5% 90.3% 79.7
NEW HAMPSHIRE 215.3 1.7 49.0 112.7 2,194.3 373.0 1,750.3 71.0 1,323,459 46653 5.1 43.4 43.8 90 6.4 15.1% 15.4% 14.8% 42.4 41.4 43.3 34.6% 62.5% 85.9
NEW JERSEY 288.5 4.5 135.8 135.6 1,882.8 403.1 1,325.2 154.5 8,899,339 47893 8.2 47.1 52.7 94 9.4 14.3% 14.9% 13.6% 39.4 37.8 41 36.6% 100.0% 90.1
NEW MEXICO 613.0 6.0 86.8 449.9 3,704.8 1,029.9 2,391.8 283.2 2,085,287 31574 6.9 14.6 53.4 167 17.8 16.5% 17.1% 15.9% 36.9 35.5 38.4 26.4% 66.7% 85.9
NEW YORK 393.7 3.3 138.6 234.7 1,824.8 287.2 1,458.8 78.8 19,651,127 45620 7 41.8 45.4 63 11.9 15.8% 16.3% 15.3% 38.2 36.6 39.8 34.1% 92.9% 89.3
NORTH CAROLINA 342.2 4.8 94.9 218.4 3,128.0 921.0 2,058.7 148.3 9,848,060 33682 8 50.3 59 109 13.6 15.9% 16.8% 15.1% 38.1 36.6 39.5 28.4% 77.6% 84.7
NORTH DAKOTA 270.1 2.2 22.4 199.9 2,094.0 405.6 1,492.7 195.7 723,393 49385 2.9 17.8 40.4 93 11.1 19.8% 20.3% 19.3% 35.3 34.2 36.7 27.1% 49.2% 82.3
OHIO 286.2 3.9 124.2 123.2 2,927.5 790.2 1,968.5 168.8 11,570,808 36175 7.4 39.1 50.7 72 13.7 15.6% 16.0% 15.2% 39.2 37.7 40.7 26.1% 79.5% 85.1
OKLAHOMA 441.2 5.1 78.7 300.8 3,273.7 866.1 2,116.4 291.2 3,850,568 38648 5.3 36.5 59.6 139 14.6 16.7% 17.1% 16.2% 36.2 34.9 37.5 23.8% 66.7% 82.7
OREGON 254.0 2.0 61.0 142.7 3,173.9 528.5 2,394.5 250.9 3,930,065 34606 7.9 27.4 48.4 68 11.8 14.8% 15.1% 14.5% 38.9 37.9 40.1 30.7% 83.4% 81.9
PENNSYLVANIA 335.4 4.7 115.6 185.7 2,060.8 407.3 1,545.6 107.8 12,773,801 40849 7.3 42.9 48.8 87 11.1 15.8% 16.1% 15.4% 40.6 38.9 42.1 28.7% 88.3% 87.8
RHODE ISLAND 257.2 2.9 65.0 147.4 2,442.0 533.2 1,696.4 212.4 1,051,511 41149 9.3 47.9 50.1 98 11.4 17.5% 17.8% 17.3% 39.9 38.1 41.6 32.4% 100.0% 86.5
SOUTH CAROLINA 508.5 6.2 83.2 373.6 3,624.2 857.8 2,502.9 263.5 4,774,839 31843 7.6 49.8 62.4 115 14.1 16.4% 17.2% 15.6% 38.6 37 40.1 26.1% 84.2% 84.9
SOUTH DAKOTA 316.5 2.4 18.8 236.2 1,914.7 399.1 1,404.6 111.0 844,877 40864 3.8 20.1 45.2 104 14.5 16.6% 16.9% 16.3% 36.7 35.6 37.9 26.6% 47.3% 83.3
TENNESSEE 590.6 5.0 112.5 436.9 3,180.9 785.1 2,213.7 182.1 6,495,978 35690 7.7 54.2 57.6 102 14.9 15.5% 16.0% 15.1% 38.5 37.1 39.8 24.8% 77.1% 84.9
TEXAS 408.3 4.3 120.2 246.9 3,258.2 721.8 2,287.8 248.6 26,448,193 39023 6.3 28.9 64.8 135 13.8 16.5% 17.0% 15.9% 34 33.1 35 27.5% 88.6% 83.5
UTAH 224.0 1.7 42.8 130.4 2,950.4 459.6 2,233.4 257.3 2,900,872 32206 4.6 12.2 48.6 125 8.6 19.4% 19.4% 19.3% 30.1 29.6 30.6 31.3% 89.3% 82.9
VERMONT 121.1 1.6 11.6 87.1 2,214.2 528.7 1,632.2 53.3 626,630 41062 4.4 42.7 42.9 58 9.6 16.7% 17.4% 16.1% 42.4 41.1 43.5 35.7% 34.3% 86.4
VIRGINIA 196.2 3.8 55.3 109.7 2,065.9 322.5 1,640.1 103.3 8,260,405 42480 5.7 44.3 55.1 100 11.4 15.5% 16.1% 15.0% 37.7 36.4 39 36.1% 87.2% 84.3
WASHINGTON 289.1 2.3 83.5 166.4 3,710.3 837.0 2,465.9 407.4 6,971,406 43003 7 38.4 48.3 58 11 15.0% 15.5% 14.6% 37.6 36.5 38.6 32.7% 89.8% 82.5
WEST VIRGINIA 300.3 3.3 35.1 226.7 2,103.9 521.7 1,478.9 103.3 1,854,304 31328 6.8 45.2 51.8 60 18 15.0% 15.4% 14.6% 41.8 40.5 43 18.9% 61.4% 88.2
WISCONSIN 277.9 2.8 84.2 161.6 2,188.7 424.0 1,636.0 128.6 5,742,713 37876 6.7 32.6 43.1 89 10.7 15.7% 15.9% 15.5% 38.9 37.8 40.1 27.7% 73.8% 85.6
WYOMING 205.1 2.9 12.9 157.2 2,198.4 335.5 1,763.6 99.2 582,658 46876 4.7 12.9 42 114 10.9 16.0% 16.4% 15.7% 36.8 36.1 37.6 26.6% 30.4% 81.6

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

More Books

Students also viewed these Finance questions