Question
PASTE INTO EXCEL AND USE THE DATA ANALYSIS ADD-IN TO PERFORM REGRESSIONS ON THE MODELS TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS Download the State Crime Excel sheet;
PASTE INTO EXCEL AND USE THE DATA ANALYSIS ADD-IN TO PERFORM REGRESSIONS ON THE MODELS TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS
Download the State Crime Excel sheet; row 2 gives detailed descriptions of each variable, while row 4 gives short versions that should be used in your regressions. Estimate the following multiple regression models (remember that all of your independent variables will have to be in adjacent columns in Excel). Look at each set of results critically and consider how you would interpret the strengths and weaknesses of each model. Save your results from each model for use when completing the end-of-module assessment. Use Burglary as your dependent variable in each model. The notation f(X,Y,Z) means a function of X, Y, Z; i.e., X, Y, and Z are your independent variables. Even though it isnt listed, each model will include an intercept.
NOTE: when Excel reports a value like 2.4E-06, this is scientific notation for 2.410?6, or 0.0000024. Model A: Burglary = f(Population, PerCapIncome, %Poverty) Model B: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %young) Model C: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %youngmale) Model D: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %youngfemale) Model E: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Rain, MedianAge, %Metro) Model F: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Temp, MedianAge, %Metro) Model G: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Sun, MedianAge, %Metro)
Question 19 Answer saved Marked out of 1.00 Remove flag Question text
In model A, how much of the variation in burglary is explained by population, per capita income, and % below the poverty line? Select one: a. 27.5% b. 44.8% c. 65.4% d. 55.2% Question 20 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text
In model A, how would you interpret the coefficient for % poverty? Select one: a. As % below the poverty line increases by 27.6, the burglary rate increases by about 1. b. As the burglary rate increases by 1, % below the poverty line increases by 27.6. c. As % below the poverty line increases by 1, the burglary rate increases by about 27.6. d. As the burglary rate increases by 27.6, % below the poverty line increases by 8.88. Question 21 Not yet answered Marked out of 1.00 Flag question Question text
Download the State Crime Excel sheet; row 2 gives detailed descriptions of each variable, while row 4 gives short versions that should be used in your regressions. Estimate the following multiple regression models (remember that all of your independent variables will have to be in adjacent columns in Excel). Look at each set of results critically and consider how you would interpret the strengths and weaknesses of each model. Save your results from each model for use when completing the end-of-module assessment. Use Burglary as your dependent variable in each model. The notation f(X,Y,Z) means a function of X, Y, Z; i.e., X, Y, and Z are your independent variables. Even though it isnt listed, each model will include an intercept. NOTE: when Excel reports a value like 2.4E-06, this is scientific notation for 2.410?6, or 0.0000024.
Model A: Burglary = f(Population, PerCapIncome, %Poverty)
Model B: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %young)
Model C: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %youngmale)
Model D: Burglary = f(%Unemploy, %youngfemale)
Model E: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Rain, MedianAge, %Metro)
Model F: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Temp, MedianAge, %Metro)
Model G: Burglary = f(PerCapIncome, Sun, MedianAge, %Metro)
Question 19
Answer saved
Marked out of 1.00
Remove flag
Question text
In model A, how much of the variation in burglary is explained by population, per capita income, and % below the poverty line?
Select one:
a. 27.5%
b. 44.8%
c. 65.4%
d. 55.2%
Question 20
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
In model A, how would you interpret the coefficient for % poverty?
Select one:
a. As % below the poverty line increases by 27.6, the burglary rate increases by about 1.
b. As the burglary rate increases by 1, % below the poverty line increases by 27.6.
c. As % below the poverty line increases by 1, the burglary rate increases by about 27.6.
d. As the burglary rate increases by 27.6, % below the poverty line increases by 8.88.
Question 21
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
In model A, the coefficient for population is statistically significant at the 10% level.
Select one:
True
False
Question 22
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
In models B through D, what seems to be the relationship between the burglary rate and the percent of the 18-64 population who are young adults (18-24)?
Select one:
a. It is difficult to describe the relationship; the young adult variables were all significant at 5% in models B, C, and D, but the signs and sizes of the coefficients were very different between models.
b. Conclusions about the relationship between young adults and the burglary rate are difficult to draw since the unemployment rate variable is consistently positive and significant, which reduces the reliability of the estimates for the young adult variables.
c. The burglary rate seems to increase as the proportion of young adults increases (models B, C, and D), though the effect is only significant (at the 10% level) for young adult males (model C).
d. We can be confident that the relationship between the burglary rate and proportion of young adults is negative, given the signs of the young adult coefficients in all models and the high adjusted R-square values.
Question 23
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
In models B through D, the relationship between the unemployment rate and the burglary rate
Select one:
a. is unimportant since, even though it was statistically significant and of the expected sign, its coefficient estimates were always smaller than the young adult coefficients.
b. cannot be assumed to be different from zero since unemployment was insignificant in all models. This data seem to show that the unemployment rate has no effect on the burglary rate.
c. seems relatively stable at about a 60-unit increase in the burglary rate for every 1% increase in the unemployment rate.
d. is expected to be negative, so the only reliable model is C since it has the largest negative coefficient for the intercept. Models B and D, with smaller negative intercept coefficients, should not be used to draw inferences about unemployment and burglary.
Question 24
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
Of all the variables in models E through G, the % in a metro area is the only one that is statistically insignificant (at the 10% level) in all models.
Select one:
True
False
Question 25
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
In model A, it was seen that per capita income was negative and significantly (at the 10% level) related to the burglary rate. In models E through G, the per capita income variable is
Select one:
a. still negatively related to the burglary rate, but is no longer significant at the 10% level.
b. more difficult to interpret since the adjusted R-squares in models E through G are higher with the different independent variables than in model A.
c. still significant, even at the 1% level, but the sign of the relationship has switched to being positively related to the burglary rate.
d. still negatively related to the burglary rate, and still significant even at the 1% level.
Question 26
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
In looking at models E and G, consistent with theory and logic, the burglary rate is negatively related to average rainfall and positively related to the number of sunny days.
Select one:
True
False
Question 27
Not yet answered
Marked out of 1.00
Flag question
Question text
The state of West Dakota currently has per capita income of $35,500, average annual temperature of 43.0 degrees, median age of 37.5 years, and 48.0% (or 0.48) of the population in a metro area. The state suddenly experiences an improvement in its economy, and increases its per capita income to $38,600. This improvement will likely be associated with the burglary rate changing from about 519 annual burgles to about ___ annual burgles (round your answer to the nearest whole number, no decimals).
Answer:
Table 5, Crime in the United States by State, Rate per 100,000 inhabitants | Non-crime variables; units are as specified in row 2 descriptors | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
State | Violent crime | Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter | Robbery | Aggravated assault | Property crime | Burglary | Larceny-theft | Motor vehicle theft | Total state population | Per capita disposable personal income, $ | unemployment rate, % | average annual rainfall, inches | average annual temperature, degrees F | # of sunny days per year | % below poverty line | % 18-24/18-64, % of the 18-to-64 year old population that is a young adult (18-24 years old) | % male 18-24/18-64, % of the 18-to-64 year old male population that is a young adult male (18-24 years old) | % female 18-24/18-64, % of the 18-to-64 year old female population that is a young adult female (18-24 years old) | Median age | Median age, Male | Median age, Female | % 25 years old and older with a bachelor's degree | % of state population living in a metropolitan area | % living in same house one year ago | ||||
State | Violent | Murder | Robbery | Assault | PropCrime | Burglary | Larceny | CarTheft | Population | PerCapIncome | %Unemploy | Rain | Temp | Sun | %Poverty | %young | %youngmale | %youngfemale | MedianAge | MedAgeMale | MedAgeFemale | %Bachelors | %Metro | %SameHouse | ||||
ALABAMA | 430.8 | 7.2 | 96.2 | 285.2 | 3,351.3 | 877.8 | 2,254.8 | 218.7 | 4,833,722 | 32448 | 7.2 | 58.3 | 62.8 | 99 | 16.2 | 16.2% | 16.7% | 15.8% | 38.4 | 36.9 | 39.8 | 23.5% | 76.0% | 85.5 | ||||
ARIZONA | 416.5 | 5.4 | 101.1 | 263.9 | 3,399.1 | 732.4 | 2,403.5 | 263.2 | 6,626,624 | 32997 | 7.7 | 13.6 | 60.3 | 193 | 16.1 | 16.7% | 17.3% | 16.1% | 36.8 | 35.5 | 38.1 | 27.4% | 94.8% | 81.7 | ||||
ARKANSAS | 460.3 | 5.4 | 76.3 | 330.5 | 3,602.6 | 1,030.1 | 2,380.6 | 191.9 | 2,959,373 | 32509 | 7.2 | 50.6 | 60.4 | 123 | 16 | 16.2% | 16.6% | 15.8% | 37.7 | 36.3 | 39 | 20.6% | 61.1% | 84.2 | ||||
CALIFORNIA | 402.1 | 4.6 | 139.9 | 232.3 | 2,658.1 | 605.4 | 1,621.5 | 431.2 | 38,332,521 | 41932 | 8.9 | 22.2 | 59.4 | 146 | 13.9 | 16.4% | 16.9% | 16.0% | 35.8 | 34.6 | 37 | 31.0% | 97.8% | 85.7 | ||||
COLORADO | 308.0 | 3.4 | 59.8 | 189.1 | 2,658.5 | 476.1 | 1,944.5 | 237.9 | 5,268,367 | 41137 | 6.9 | 15.9 | 45.1 | 136 | 8.5 | 15.0% | 15.5% | 14.6% | 36.5 | 35.5 | 37.5 | 37.8% | 87.0% | 81.1 | ||||
CONNECTICUT | 262.5 | 2.4 | 98.2 | 135.4 | 1,974.1 | 358.5 | 1,442.6 | 173.0 | 3,596,080 | 53842 | 7.8 | 50.3 | 49 | 82 | 9.8 | 15.3% | 16.0% | 14.6% | 40.6 | 38.8 | 42.1 | 37.2% | 94.8% | 87.8 | ||||
DELAWARE | 491.4 | 4.2 | 132.4 | 313.7 | 3,065.5 | 662.3 | 2,259.4 | 143.9 | 925,749 | 38891 | 6.7 | 45.7 | 55.3 | 97 | 11.6 | 16.0% | 16.5% | 15.6% | 39.5 | 37.9 | 41 | 29.8% | 100.0% | 86.7 | ||||
FLORIDA | 470.4 | 5.0 | 118.7 | 312.3 | 3,105.3 | 710.5 | 2,216.3 | 178.6 | 19,552,860 | 36601 | 7.2 | 54.5 | 70.7 | 101 | 13 | 15.0% | 15.6% | 14.5% | 41.5 | 40 | 42.9 | 27.2% | 96.4% | 83.9 | ||||
GEORGIA | 365.7 | 5.6 | 125.0 | 209.3 | 3,346.6 | 823.2 | 2,254.9 | 268.5 | 9,992,167 | 33111 | 8.2 | 50.7 | 63.5 | 112 | 15.4 | 16.0% | 16.7% | 15.4% | 36 | 34.7 | 37.3 | 28.3% | 82.3% | 84 | ||||
IDAHO | 217.0 | 1.7 | 13.6 | 161.0 | 1,864.3 | 411.9 | 1,357.1 | 95.3 | 1,612,136 | 32348 | 6.1 | 18.9 | 44.4 | 120 | 11.1 | 16.3% | 16.6% | 16.0% | 35.4 | 34.6 | 36.2 | 26.2% | 66.2% | 82.5 | ||||
ILLINOIS | 380.2 | 5.5 | 137.6 | 204.0 | 2,274.3 | 452.1 | 1,659.8 | 162.5 | 12,882,135 | 40584 | 9 | 39.2 | 51.8 | 95 | 12.1 | 15.5% | 15.9% | 15.0% | 37.2 | 35.9 | 38.6 | 32.1% | 88.3% | 86.7 | ||||
INDIANA | 357.4 | 5.4 | 108.2 | 211.3 | 2,854.0 | 653.0 | 1,984.9 | 216.2 | 6,570,902 | 35171 | 7.6 | 41.7 | 51.7 | 88 | 11.8 | 16.5% | 16.9% | 16.1% | 37.3 | 36 | 38.6 | 23.8% | 77.6% | 84.9 | ||||
IOWA | 271.4 | 1.4 | 30.4 | 204.6 | 2,193.9 | 513.5 | 1,543.0 | 137.4 | 3,090,416 | 38702 | 4.7 | 34 | 47.8 | 105 | 9.8 | 17.0% | 17.4% | 16.7% | 38 | 36.6 | 39.4 | 26.4% | 58.3% | 84.6 | ||||
KANSAS | 339.9 | 3.9 | 46.6 | 248.1 | 2,946.8 | 600.4 | 2,117.0 | 229.5 | 2,893,957 | 41139 | 5.3 | 28.9 | 54.3 | 128 | 11.2 | 17.0% | 17.6% | 16.4% | 36.1 | 34.8 | 37.4 | 31.1% | 67.1% | 83.5 | ||||
KENTUCKY | 209.8 | 3.8 | 73.9 | 95.5 | 2,362.9 | 596.4 | 1,629.3 | 137.2 | 4,395,295 | 31960 | 8 | 48.9 | 55.6 | 93 | 15.2 | 15.7% | 16.1% | 15.2% | 38.4 | 37 | 39.8 | 22.6% | 58.2% | 84.5 | ||||
LOUISIANA | 518.5 | 10.8 | 119.9 | 352.8 | 3,582.0 | 890.4 | 2,493.6 | 198.0 | 4,625,470 | 36241 | 6.7 | 60.1 | 66.4 | 101 | 20.2 | 16.3% | 16.7% | 16.0% | 36.1 | 34.8 | 37.4 | 22.5% | 83.4% | 86.5 | ||||
MAINE | 129.3 | 1.8 | 25.2 | 68.7 | 2,292.2 | 488.1 | 1,735.3 | 68.8 | 1,328,302 | 35617 | 6.7 | 42.2 | 41 | 101 | 12.7 | 13.8% | 14.3% | 13.3% | 43.8 | 42.6 | 45 | 28.2% | 58.8% | 86.3 | ||||
MARYLAND | 473.8 | 6.4 | 169.5 | 272.0 | 2,663.5 | 538.9 | 1,898.3 | 226.3 | 5,928,814 | 45652 | 6.6 | 44.5 | 54.2 | 105 | 7.1 | 14.9% | 15.6% | 14.2% | 38.3 | 36.6 | 39.8 | 37.4% | 97.4% | 86.5 | ||||
MASSACHUSETTS | 413.4 | 2.0 | 100.2 | 270.5 | 2,051.2 | 459.2 | 1,455.7 | 136.3 | 6,692,824 | 48472 | 6.7 | 47.7 | 47.9 | 98 | 9.6 | 16.1% | 16.5% | 15.8% | 39.3 | 37.8 | 40.8 | 40.3% | 98.5% | 87.1 | ||||
MICHIGAN | 449.9 | 6.4 | 102.1 | 274.8 | 2,327.6 | 569.4 | 1,510.0 | 248.3 | 9,895,622 | 34853 | 8.8 | 32.8 | 44.4 | 71 | 11.1 | 16.5% | 16.9% | 16.0% | 39.5 | 38.1 | 40.9 | 26.9% | 81.8% | 85.3 | ||||
MINNESOTA | 234.4 | 2.1 | 67.8 | 127.5 | 2,420.4 | 419.0 | 1,854.4 | 147.0 | 5,420,380 | 40924 | 5 | 27.3 | 41.2 | 95 | 8.7 | 15.0% | 15.2% | 14.8% | 37.7 | 36.6 | 38.7 | 33.5% | 77.2% | 85.5 | ||||
MISSISSIPPI | 274.6 | 6.5 | 80.5 | 156.5 | 2,724.7 | 835.6 | 1,742.3 | 146.7 | 2,991,207 | 30608 | 8.5 | 59 | 63.4 | 111 | 21.1 | 17.1% | 17.7% | 16.6% | 36.5 | 35 | 37.9 | 20.4% | 45.5% | 86.1 | ||||
MISSOURI | 433.4 | 6.1 | 90.7 | 298.7 | 3,137.0 | 643.0 | 2,223.9 | 270.1 | 6,044,171 | 35625 | 6.7 | 42.2 | 54.5 | 115 | 13 | 16.0% | 16.4% | 15.5% | 38.2 | 36.7 | 39.6 | 27.0% | 74.3% | 84 | ||||
MONTANA | 252.9 | 2.2 | 20.1 | 190.2 | 2,556.5 | 400.3 | 1,974.0 | 182.2 | 1,015,165 | 35379 | 5.4 | 15.3 | 42.7 | 82 | 11.7 | 15.9% | 16.5% | 15.3% | 39.9 | 38.7 | 41.1 | 29.0% | 35.4% | 83.5 | ||||
NEBRASKA | 262.1 | 3.1 | 55.7 | 160.5 | 2,623.4 | 476.3 | 1,908.2 | 238.9 | 1,868,516 | 41135 | 3.8 | 23.6 | 48.8 | 117 | 9.6 | 16.5% | 16.8% | 16.2% | 36.2 | 35.1 | 37.4 | 29.4% | 64.2% | 83.9 | ||||
NEVADA | 603.0 | 5.8 | 185.8 | 360.6 | 2,837.7 | 826.0 | 1,653.4 | 358.3 | 2,790,136 | 34855 | 9.6 | 9.5 | 49.9 | 158 | 10.1 | 14.5% | 14.6% | 14.3% | 37.3 | 36.7 | 37.9 | 22.5% | 90.3% | 79.7 | ||||
NEW HAMPSHIRE | 215.3 | 1.7 | 49.0 | 112.7 | 2,194.3 | 373.0 | 1,750.3 | 71.0 | 1,323,459 | 46653 | 5.1 | 43.4 | 43.8 | 90 | 6.4 | 15.1% | 15.4% | 14.8% | 42.4 | 41.4 | 43.3 | 34.6% | 62.5% | 85.9 | ||||
NEW JERSEY | 288.5 | 4.5 | 135.8 | 135.6 | 1,882.8 | 403.1 | 1,325.2 | 154.5 | 8,899,339 | 47893 | 8.2 | 47.1 | 52.7 | 94 | 9.4 | 14.3% | 14.9% | 13.6% | 39.4 | 37.8 | 41 | 36.6% | 100.0% | 90.1 | ||||
NEW MEXICO | 613.0 | 6.0 | 86.8 | 449.9 | 3,704.8 | 1,029.9 | 2,391.8 | 283.2 | 2,085,287 | 31574 | 6.9 | 14.6 | 53.4 | 167 | 17.8 | 16.5% | 17.1% | 15.9% | 36.9 | 35.5 | 38.4 | 26.4% | 66.7% | 85.9 | ||||
NEW YORK | 393.7 | 3.3 | 138.6 | 234.7 | 1,824.8 | 287.2 | 1,458.8 | 78.8 | 19,651,127 | 45620 | 7 | 41.8 | 45.4 | 63 | 11.9 | 15.8% | 16.3% | 15.3% | 38.2 | 36.6 | 39.8 | 34.1% | 92.9% | 89.3 | ||||
NORTH CAROLINA | 342.2 | 4.8 | 94.9 | 218.4 | 3,128.0 | 921.0 | 2,058.7 | 148.3 | 9,848,060 | 33682 | 8 | 50.3 | 59 | 109 | 13.6 | 15.9% | 16.8% | 15.1% | 38.1 | 36.6 | 39.5 | 28.4% | 77.6% | 84.7 | ||||
NORTH DAKOTA | 270.1 | 2.2 | 22.4 | 199.9 | 2,094.0 | 405.6 | 1,492.7 | 195.7 | 723,393 | 49385 | 2.9 | 17.8 | 40.4 | 93 | 11.1 | 19.8% | 20.3% | 19.3% | 35.3 | 34.2 | 36.7 | 27.1% | 49.2% | 82.3 | ||||
OHIO | 286.2 | 3.9 | 124.2 | 123.2 | 2,927.5 | 790.2 | 1,968.5 | 168.8 | 11,570,808 | 36175 | 7.4 | 39.1 | 50.7 | 72 | 13.7 | 15.6% | 16.0% | 15.2% | 39.2 | 37.7 | 40.7 | 26.1% | 79.5% | 85.1 | ||||
OKLAHOMA | 441.2 | 5.1 | 78.7 | 300.8 | 3,273.7 | 866.1 | 2,116.4 | 291.2 | 3,850,568 | 38648 | 5.3 | 36.5 | 59.6 | 139 | 14.6 | 16.7% | 17.1% | 16.2% | 36.2 | 34.9 | 37.5 | 23.8% | 66.7% | 82.7 | ||||
OREGON | 254.0 | 2.0 | 61.0 | 142.7 | 3,173.9 | 528.5 | 2,394.5 | 250.9 | 3,930,065 | 34606 | 7.9 | 27.4 | 48.4 | 68 | 11.8 | 14.8% | 15.1% | 14.5% | 38.9 | 37.9 | 40.1 | 30.7% | 83.4% | 81.9 | ||||
PENNSYLVANIA | 335.4 | 4.7 | 115.6 | 185.7 | 2,060.8 | 407.3 | 1,545.6 | 107.8 | 12,773,801 | 40849 | 7.3 | 42.9 | 48.8 | 87 | 11.1 | 15.8% | 16.1% | 15.4% | 40.6 | 38.9 | 42.1 | 28.7% | 88.3% | 87.8 | ||||
RHODE ISLAND | 257.2 | 2.9 | 65.0 | 147.4 | 2,442.0 | 533.2 | 1,696.4 | 212.4 | 1,051,511 | 41149 | 9.3 | 47.9 | 50.1 | 98 | 11.4 | 17.5% | 17.8% | 17.3% | 39.9 | 38.1 | 41.6 | 32.4% | 100.0% | 86.5 | ||||
SOUTH CAROLINA | 508.5 | 6.2 | 83.2 | 373.6 | 3,624.2 | 857.8 | 2,502.9 | 263.5 | 4,774,839 | 31843 | 7.6 | 49.8 | 62.4 | 115 | 14.1 | 16.4% | 17.2% | 15.6% | 38.6 | 37 | 40.1 | 26.1% | 84.2% | 84.9 | ||||
SOUTH DAKOTA | 316.5 | 2.4 | 18.8 | 236.2 | 1,914.7 | 399.1 | 1,404.6 | 111.0 | 844,877 | 40864 | 3.8 | 20.1 | 45.2 | 104 | 14.5 | 16.6% | 16.9% | 16.3% | 36.7 | 35.6 | 37.9 | 26.6% | 47.3% | 83.3 | ||||
TENNESSEE | 590.6 | 5.0 | 112.5 | 436.9 | 3,180.9 | 785.1 | 2,213.7 | 182.1 | 6,495,978 | 35690 | 7.7 | 54.2 | 57.6 | 102 | 14.9 | 15.5% | 16.0% | 15.1% | 38.5 | 37.1 | 39.8 | 24.8% | 77.1% | 84.9 | ||||
TEXAS | 408.3 | 4.3 | 120.2 | 246.9 | 3,258.2 | 721.8 | 2,287.8 | 248.6 | 26,448,193 | 39023 | 6.3 | 28.9 | 64.8 | 135 | 13.8 | 16.5% | 17.0% | 15.9% | 34 | 33.1 | 35 | 27.5% | 88.6% | 83.5 | ||||
UTAH | 224.0 | 1.7 | 42.8 | 130.4 | 2,950.4 | 459.6 | 2,233.4 | 257.3 | 2,900,872 | 32206 | 4.6 | 12.2 | 48.6 | 125 | 8.6 | 19.4% | 19.4% | 19.3% | 30.1 | 29.6 | 30.6 | 31.3% | 89.3% | 82.9 | ||||
VERMONT | 121.1 | 1.6 | 11.6 | 87.1 | 2,214.2 | 528.7 | 1,632.2 | 53.3 | 626,630 | 41062 | 4.4 | 42.7 | 42.9 | 58 | 9.6 | 16.7% | 17.4% | 16.1% | 42.4 | 41.1 | 43.5 | 35.7% | 34.3% | 86.4 | ||||
VIRGINIA | 196.2 | 3.8 | 55.3 | 109.7 | 2,065.9 | 322.5 | 1,640.1 | 103.3 | 8,260,405 | 42480 | 5.7 | 44.3 | 55.1 | 100 | 11.4 | 15.5% | 16.1% | 15.0% | 37.7 | 36.4 | 39 | 36.1% | 87.2% | 84.3 | ||||
WASHINGTON | 289.1 | 2.3 | 83.5 | 166.4 | 3,710.3 | 837.0 | 2,465.9 | 407.4 | 6,971,406 | 43003 | 7 | 38.4 | 48.3 | 58 | 11 | 15.0% | 15.5% | 14.6% | 37.6 | 36.5 | 38.6 | 32.7% | 89.8% | 82.5 | ||||
WEST VIRGINIA | 300.3 | 3.3 | 35.1 | 226.7 | 2,103.9 | 521.7 | 1,478.9 | 103.3 | 1,854,304 | 31328 | 6.8 | 45.2 | 51.8 | 60 | 18 | 15.0% | 15.4% | 14.6% | 41.8 | 40.5 | 43 | 18.9% | 61.4% | 88.2 | ||||
WISCONSIN | 277.9 | 2.8 | 84.2 | 161.6 | 2,188.7 | 424.0 | 1,636.0 | 128.6 | 5,742,713 | 37876 | 6.7 | 32.6 | 43.1 | 89 | 10.7 | 15.7% | 15.9% | 15.5% | 38.9 | 37.8 | 40.1 | 27.7% | 73.8% | 85.6 | ||||
WYOMING | 205.1 | 2.9 | 12.9 | 157.2 | 2,198.4 | 335.5 | 1,763.6 | 99.2 | 582,658 | 46876 | 4.7 | 12.9 | 42 | 114 | 10.9 | 16.0% | 16.4% | 15.7% | 36.8 | 36.1 | 37.6 | 26.6% | 30.4% | 81.6 |
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started