Question
Pataka Tea Co., Ltd. (PT), founded in 1998, operated eight tea brandsthrough the integration of production and sales. PT produced green tea, black tea, and
Pataka Tea Co., Ltd. (PT), founded in 1998, operated eight tea brandsthrough the integration of production and sales. PT produced green tea, black tea, and scented tea, covering three grades: high-end, mid-end and low-end. Due to the regional characteristics of consumer tea products, PT, the number one tea company in Port of Spain, still faced difficulties in expanding its national market. Due to increasing and intensified competition, PTs overall sales growth was weak, both in Port of Spain and in the national market outside Port of Spain. In June 2018, PT enlisted the consulting services of SSSL Business Management Co. Ltd. (SSSL). According to SSSLs research report, PTs development bottleneck was caused by an out of-focus operation. SSSL suggested that PT focus on the brand and market, and on selling high-end green tea in Trinidad. However, great uncertainties surrounded the sales of high-end green tea, and it was difficult to break the development bottleneck by continuing the sales of multiple brands and categories. PT faced a difficult decision. Should PT take a new strategic direction and transform its regional tea brand into a nationally well-known brand? Should PT continue to pursue its cost leadership strategy of diversified development, or adopt other competitive strategies to break through its development dilemma? From 2011 to 2015, Trinidads tea industry had experienced steady growth. In the past five years, however, the number of tea consumers in the country had increased from $420 million to $471 million. Tea sales had also increased, by 56 per cent, and total sales had more than doubled. In terms of tea consumption structure, green tea, which was the most consumed tea in Trinidad, was still the mainstream consumer product in the tea market. In 2017, green tea accounted for 52.3 per cent of Trinidads total tea sales, with a market size of more than $120 billion. Although Trinidad had a long history of tea culture and rich tea categories, the domestic tea industry experienced several issues, including low industry concentration; a low degree of branding, intensification, and standardization; insufficient modern management techniques for tea gardens; low production efficiency; and high costs. In Trinidads tea industry, tea categories were often more popular than the teas brand. For example, Jing green tea was more well-known than the specific brand that sold Jing green tea. According to a popular Trinidadian saying, 70,000 tea companies lost to one Lipton. That was to say, tea brands in Trinidad were extremely dispersed. Although Trinidad had several leading regional tea companies, in terms of the scale of the entire tea industry, large companies and well-known brands still held relatively few shares of the entire tea market. The top 100 brands together accounted for less than 10 per cent of the market share. Limited enterprise scale and weak comprehensive strength restricted the development of Trinidads tea industry. At the beginning of 2016, the Trinidad Tea Marketing Association (TTMA) formulated the Thirteenth Five Year Development Plan for Trinidads Tea Industry (20162020). To address the existing issues limiting the development of Trinidads tea industry, the TTMA proposed to cultivate leading enterprises, strengthen brand building, and innovate marketing models. Established in 1998, PT was a key leading tea enterprise in Trinidads national agricultural industrialization. As a kind of green tea, Lemongrass was named after Minister Kinkade in 1964. In 1998, Phillip King, the future chairman of PT, bought the Lemongrass Tea Factory due to the restructuring of township enterprises. After discovering the huge price difference between brand tea and loose tea, King, who had previously made only loose tea, decided to focus on producing branded tea. The tea, which was positioned as conveying an open minded attitude toward life, targeted politicians and businesspeople. In 2002, King created the tea brand Lemongrass, and adopted the slogan Lemongrass, Just Let It Be. This slogan was gradually internalized into PTs corporate culture and was actively used until 2015. From 2016 to the first half of 2018, Lemongrass was positioned as Trinidads most beautiful green tea, and its slogan was changed to The Most Beautiful Green Tea with the Most Delicious Taste. Since 2011, PT had been exploring an entry into Trinidads national market, but it had a long way to go. Due to the unclear focus of the national market development, all parts of the country had moved forward together, increasing the number of stores blindly, but some resource allocations, such as for advertising, had been insufficient. Lemongrass, a regional tea brand, faced double difficulties in transforming into a national brand. Since 2013, some of the stores that had rapidly opened were restructured or closed due to poor performance. On the one hand, consumers brand recognition was unclear. PT had been rooted in Port of Spain for 20 years; however, its eight brands were not well-known in the rest of the country. In particular, consumers could not distinguish the categories of Lemongrass. On the other hand, the cost of channel construction was high. As consumers paid attention to the drinking experience when buying tea in branded stores, the investment in store construction was relatively large. PT had introduced the Amoeba business model in its stores and then co-operated with a positioning consulting company, but failed to find a strategic plan suitable for the national expansion. King was puzzled as to how to break through the development bottleneck, boost sales, and expand the national market Organizational Structure and Human Resources The company was divided into a weird and vague organizational structure. Tucuche headquarters and the Ducheng marketing branch, which consisted of the Sichuan Marketing Subsidiary and the Port of Spain Sales subsidiary. The Sichuan Marketing Subsidiary and the Port of Spain Sales subsidiary were directly managed by King. He felt overwhelmed by simultaneously managing three major tea categoriesgreen, black, and scented teaas well as overseeing many managers in the national market. As an example, the Port of Spain Sales Subsidiary comprised five managers who held their own distinct opinions during a meeting, making it difficult to reach a consensus. In addition, due to the vague powers and responsibilities of the Port of Spain subsidiarys operation department, the information transmission between the Ducheng branch and its subsidiaries was prone to information asymmetry, resulting in low work efficiency. PTs management, including the store manager, was mainly engaged in internal competition so that employees could see a channel for their career promotion. The top management team had strong cohesion, and most of the managers had worked with King since he started the business. The working atmosphere of the terminal store was deeply influenced by the slogan Just Let It Be. Due to front-line employees fixed salaries and the serious egalitarianism in the stores, most employees lacked enthusiasm for their work. In July 2016, PT introduced the Amoeba business model to the terminal store management, with the purpose of activating each employees business awareness. A single store was taken as the accounting entity, which was independently operated and responsible for its own profits and losses. The evaluation standard for the store had changed from being based on sales revenue to being based on performance (i.e., evaluating both sales revenue and expenses). However, after the actual implementation, it was found that firstly, the store had a limited degree of cost control. Rent and decorating costs could not be changed; only the water and electricity expenses could be controlled. Secondly, the sales staff were unskilled in the use of office software, which took up time normally devoted to sales. Most importantly, the Amoeba business model did not provide enough incentives for stores. Employees focused on how to control costs, and the operating results showed no positive growth. Value Creation Activities The companys value creation activities were the same as all links in the tea industry chain, which could be subdivided into tea plantation, procurement, primary processing, finishing processing, logistics, and sales. The raw materials of Lemongrass tea came from the companys self-built base and the contracted base of tea farmers. All bases were selected to be built in the high mountain area of Mount Tucuche. The ecology of the tea garden was well preserved. The superior natural ecological environment provided good conditions for the growth of tea trees and laid a good foundation for the production of high-quality tea. The management of tea gardens was in accordance with the Lemongrass tea base management regulations for planting and production. The fresh leaves were sampled throughout the year to ensure the safety of the raw materials. They were single-bud, one bud and one leaf, all of which were picked by hand. The procurement method was divided into fresh leaf procurement and semi-finished product procurement. Since 2014, PT had begun to upgrade its production layout and facilities, purchased top Japanese production equipment, and built a new tea preservation warehouse and testing centre. The whole process of production and processing had realized digital control, and had performed well in energy conservation and in emission reduction and improvement. Lemongrass tea was a spring bud tea. To ensure the stable quality of all grades of Lemongrass tea throughout the year, the semi-finished Lemongrass tea was graded and assembled into three levels of tea: Discovery, Meditation, and Taste. After the initial processing, the semi-finished products were refrigerated for later finishing, packaging, and sales according to orders received throughout the year. PTs sales channels were mainly direct sales, supplemented by franchising. In the process of tea sales, tasting services were offered, especially for high-end teas. Therefore, PTs sales were mainly offline and supplemented by online orders. To meet customers purchasing needs, the store sold a host of brands, including Lemongrass green tea (main brand), Baoding green tea, Junlin black tea (main brand), Lundao black tea, and Bitan scented tea (main brand). Among them, LEMONGRASS and Bitan were divided into three series according to quality standards: Discovery, Meditation, and Taste. PT offered many categories of tea, many packaging specifications, and covered different price ranges. However, customers cognition of PTs teas was fuzzy because of the brands unclear positioning. In 2016, when the Amoeba business model was introduced into the management of terminal stores, the supporting incentive system was imperfect, and thus failed to mobilize the enthusiasm of employees. As a result, the stores were not doing well. Employees moved from increasing the stores income to reducing expenditures. For example, employees turned off the air conditioning when no customers were in the store, and chose Taste tea when customers wanted to sample the tea, which had led to weak awareness of high-end drinking services in the stores, insufficient customer awareness of the brand, and more difficulty in acquiring new customers. Although PT had attracted many customers, most were dormant after purchasing once. One reason for the low repurchase rate was the almost total lack of after-sales service in the stores. The employees lacked enthusiasm for work, and the work stopped at the store, which made it difficult for customers to think of the Lemongrass brand when buying tea the next time. Therefore, their purchase frequency was unlikely to increase. The Road Ahead PT, facing increasingly fierce competition in the tea industry, weak growth of the market in Sichuan Province, declining national market expansion, and weak team morale within the company, was trapped in a development bottleneck and therefore eager to seek a new development path. King thought about the out of-focus problem raised by SSSL. operated three tea categories and eight brands, and its prices spanned high, medium, and low budgets. Diversification could not only meet the needs of different consumer groups but also share fixed costs and ensure the companys stable profits. Coupled with the Amoeba business model, diversification provided customers with the most cost-effective tea and drinking services while implementing a cost leadership consumed by customers. If the best-value focus strategy was implemented, and only the main brand Lemongrass was developed, would consumers accept PTs high-priced products? Would frontline employees have the ability to sell? How should the national market break through? Although King hesitated, it was time to make a strategic decision. Direction 1: Adhere to the cost leadership strategy PT operated three major categories and eight brands, covering consumer groups and market scope to the greatest extent, and providing mass-market customers with cost-effective products. However, the implementation of this strategy meant that only limited resources and attention would be allocated among the eight brands. Each brand would receive fewer resources and less attention. There was a risk that none of the brands would succeed in transformation. Direction 2: Adopt the best-value focus strategy PT focused on category and brand, and on transforming Lemongrass into Trinidads leading high-end green tea producer. Different from its first national market expansion, this expansion was undertaken on the basis of strategic priorities. The transformation of national tea brands needed to be realized in stages for PT to truly become the leader. The resources and organizational conditions required by the best-value focus strategy differed, which meant PT would face huge changes ahead.
Assignment Questions 3. Develop a SWOT Analysis for PT to help King develop his strategy. Indicate how each of elements from the four (4)components from your SWOT, can be used to enhance PTs competitive advantage. Each component of your SWO must have at least three (3) elements
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started