Pell v. Victor J. Andrew High School State the names of the plaintiff and defendant, the volume number, page number, name of the reporter, and the court that decided the case. Describe the facts of the case. What was the cause of action? What was the courts disposition of the case? What criteria should a product warning meet in order to be deemed adequate in risk reduction? How did the mini-tramp measure up to the criteria? What role did foreseeability play in this case? Why did AMFs defense of contributory negligence not work? Would the comparative fault principle work? Why or why not? Why was the defendant opposed to evidence regarding full-sized trampolines? What could AMF have done to make its warning better? From the manufacturers perspective, what type of information should be included with gymnastic floor equipment? As the athletic director at a high school, what information on this type of equipment might you seek? Are there noticeable gaps in the information provided and sought?