People v. Stimler(Chapters 1 & 2):Mark Stimler is charged with the crime of theft.Specifically, he is accused of stealing a diamond necklace from the home of his neighbor, Abby Kim. Stimler chooses to have his case decided by a judge, rather than a jury. At the end of the trial, the judge in the case finds him guilty. In his opinion, the judge explains that he did not think there was evidence showing that Stimler had committed theft. However, the judge said that because Stimler was not supposed to be on Kim's property anyway, he should be found guilty because the judge believes the law should be that being on a person's property without permission is enough for "theft."Stimler appeals his conviction and argues that he should have been found innocent? What will the appellate court likely decide?