People who borrowed money from Buckeye Check Cashing signed an agreement that included a clause requiring any dispute to go to arbitration. Some customers against Buckeye claimed their service violated the lending laws of Florida, which would make the agreement invalid, and filed suit. The Florida high court held that because the legality of the contract was in question, the matter had to go to court for review, not arbitration. Do you think that the U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court upheld ruling on review?