Pepsi-Cola ran an advertisement campaign drink Pepsi get stuff if consumers collected enough caps from Pepsi products they could redeem them for merchandise on the print ad was the picture of a jet a military aircraft that cost over $1 million Bubba and some investors collected about $350,000 worth of Pepsi caps and demanded his jet. What is this critical issue as to whether or not there is a contract? Did Pepsi really mean for the ad to be an offer? Would a reasonable person give all circumstances have assumed the ad was an offer? Is $350,000 a fair and adequate price for the jet? Did Bubba really really think the ad was an offer