Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

Personal injury action by the plaintiff pedestrian (P) against the driver defendant (D) . P was walking through a crosswalk and was struck by D

Personal injury action by the plaintiff pedestrian (P) against the driver defendant (D) . P was walking through a crosswalk and was struck by D in his car and was seriously injured. To help prove the identity of D as the driver and the pain and suffering he endured, after P testifies, he calls W to testify that moments after the the collision, W approached P and heard P cry out to W, "that guy just ran over me I'm in so much pain and I'm bleeding out, I think I'm going to die please call 911!" Which of the following is true? Group of answer choices (A) W's testimony concerning P's statement is most likely admissible as an opposing party statement. (B) W's testimony concerning P's statement is most likely admissible as a dying declaration. (C) W's testimony concerning P's statement is most likely admissible as an excited utterance. (D) both (B) and (C) (E) All of the above

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Smith and Roberson Business Law

Authors: Richard A. Mann, Barry S. Roberts

15th Edition

1285141903, 1285141903, 9781285141909, 978-0538473637

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions