Peter and Wendy married in 2002 and have 2 children, John (age 11) and Michael (age 9). When they married, Peter and Wendy bought a house together. The house is worth 300,000. There is no outstanding mortgage on the house. When the children were born, Wendy gave up herjob as a teacher to look after them. She suffers from chronic arthritis and this has meant that she could not return to work when the children started school. Peter is a senior manager in a local supermarket. Mrs Hook, the headteacher of John's school has contacted Peter and Wendy to say that John has been caught stealing money from another pupil. Mrs Hook has told Peter and Wendy that she has no choice but to call in the police as John has admitted committing a criminal offence. age of criminal responsibility Michael realises that money is short in the household and wanted to help. He decided to sell his brand new games W (which cost 300) for 75 to a classmate. Michael has handed over the computer and received payment. Peter and Wendy want to reverse this transaction, but are unsure if they can. age of legal capacity Peter and Wendy's relationship has deteriorated over the last year and there is a toxic atmosphere in the household. They have decided to divorce. Wendy has stated that Peter will have to move out of the family home and the children will continue to live with her. She has said that, under no circumstances will she allow Peter to have contact with the children after separation because both children have told her that they don't want to see their dad. Peter has said that he will raise an action for contact in the sheriff court, but Wendy said that she will still refuse to allow contact. Peter and Wendy have come to an agreement on how they will divide up the value of the net matrimonial property. However, two areas of disagreement remain. First, Wendy will be unable to resume working after divorce as a result of her chronic arthritis. She says that Peter must pay her periodical allowance for an unlimited time. Peter says that he will pay it only for three years and no more. Secondly, Wendy inherited 20,000 from her parents two years ago. The money was paid into theirjoint bank account. Wendy used 5,000 to buy new furniture for the family home. Peter said that the 20,000 is matrimonial property. Wendy claims that the 20,000 is not matrimonial property because she inherited it