Peter Henderson is an extremely wealthy businessman. He makes a pledge of exist1 million to his church, Sacred Heart Catholic Church, to fund a new parish ha l and writes an initial check for exist250,000. The church contracts with a builder, pays an initial deposit, and construction begins. A few month later, Henderson decides that he does not want to fulfill his promise and refuses to give sacred Heart the rest of the funds. He says that since there was no consideration involved, his promise was a gift and that On which legal doctrine could sacred Heart challenge Henderson's claim? The church can challenge Henderson's claim based on the doctrine of accord and satisfaction. The church can challenge Henderson's claim based on the doctrine of promissory The church can challenge Henderson's claim based on the doctrine of preexisting duty The church can challenge Henderson's dam based on the doctrine of part consideration