Peter Morton was convicted in California for gross vehicular manslaughter and received a prison sentence of 6 years. He accidentally ran over his niece when he was backing out of his driveway and was found with some alcohol in his system. His conviction would be equivalent to a conviction in Canada under s 249 of theCriminal Codefor dangerous driving causing death.

Which of the following statements istrue?

A)Peter would have to apply for individual rehabilitation if at least 5 years have passed since the date he was convicted

B)Peter would be deemed rehabilitated if at least 10 years have passed since the completion of the sentence imposed for his crime.

C)Peter would never be eligible for rehabilitation as his crime is considered serious in Canada.

D)Peter would have to apply for individual rehabilitation if at least 5 years have passed since the completion of the imposed sentence for his crime.