Question
PetroSolutions owned the following unproved property as of the end of 2003. Significant Leases Insignificant Leases Lease A $520,000 Lease B $75,000 Lease C $300,000
PetroSolutions owned the following unproved property as of the end of 2003.
Significant Leases | Insignificant Leases | ||
Lease A | $520,000 | Lease B | $75,000 |
Lease C | $300,000 | Lease D | $50,000 |
Total | $820,000 | Lease E | $35,000 |
Lease F | $25,000 | ||
Total | $185,000 |
Although no activity took place on Lease A during the year, PetroSolutions decided that Lease A was not impaired because there were still four years left in that lease’s primary term. One dry hole was drilled on Lease C during the year; but because PetroSolutions intended to drill one more well on Lease C in the coming year, it decided that Lease C was only 50% impaired. With respect to the insignificant leases, past experience indicates that 68% of all unproved properties assessed on a group basis will eventually be abandoned. PetroSolutions’s policy is to provide at year-end an allowance equal to 70% of the gross cost of these properties. The allowance account had a balance of $24,000 at year end. Give the entries to record impairment, calculate income tax expense, and prepare the post-closing trial balance.
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started